Do you believe dinosaurs existed?

11416181920

Replies

  • kai_valyakai_valya Posts: 16,575
    Ms Eudoxie wrote: »
    I can't see air, parasites, particles with the naked eye but these things can be proven in any lab. It;s the difference between facts and theories.

    do you know that gravity is just a theory, you do believe in that don't you?
  • kai_valya wrote: »
    i'm guessing the answer to my question at the end is none huh? sweetie, go and take a science class please for all our sakes.

    this thread has made me so sad. hopefully going to my microbio class can make me feel a little better.

    Why skid around a simple question. Was that a factual statement you made or just another assumption, guesstimate, etc.
  • edwardnigmaedwardnigma Posts: 2,686
    kai_valya wrote: »
    well since there are an infinite number of miniscule measurements between 5'5" and 5'6", i can approximately be 5'5". just like Pi is approximately 3.14, you can get more and more approximate with every decimal place, and since pi is an irrational number you could go on like this forever.

    Kai, C'mon son....approximate means close to.

    So are you 5'5 or 5'6? Which is the fact? Not which one are you closest to. Tell me your actual height, not your approximate height.
  • The first species of sharks were different, yes, HOWEVER: Studies show that Modern day sharks are the only species that did not change over time and these modern sharks have existed for over 100 million years and were here around the time of dinosaurs.

    Ancient sharks date back to over 450 million years ago. These prehistoric sharks existed before dinosaurs. One significant difference between ancient and modern sharks was them not replacing their teeth as modern sharks do today.

    People don't even realize how essential sharks are to our existence. Great whites are becoming more and more extinct but that's a whole different thread.
  • edwardnigmaedwardnigma Posts: 2,686
    KAi and Eudoxi are having a very cute debate, you two should put o live cams and do it in bikinis!

    And stop believing in Dragons and Gargoyles folks. Not a good look.
  • kai_valya wrote: »
    do you know that gravity is just a theory, you do believe in that don't you?

    Gravity is a law.
  • Dinosaur is a word that cause Hysteria. TERRIBLE LIZARD

    Like I said before, I believe Dinosaurs is an exaggeration of the truth.

    There once was a time when alot of the creatures today were much bigger.

    The Lizards were not that big, maybe the size of a human today, biggest was the ancestor to the elephant. Even humans, being 10 to `12 ft tall were in abundance.

    I don't know why everyone is trippin. I didn't say anything outlandish but Scientist exaggerated a story.

    Big Lizards and Birds didnt fucking rule the earth, everything was fucking bigger, and the Big People killed the big animals.

    Thats so primitive and easy to understand.

    If you can believe in Dragons and you can't believe that there were people taller then Andre the Giant then I just dont get that logic lol

    why couldn't more creatures other than Lizrards have been humongous as well? Why do you peolpe think thats crazy

    Because a scientist aint say so......yet?

    Bruh...there was NO people at the time.
  • GenericGeneric Posts: 1,043
    Ms Eudoxie wrote: »
    .....perhaps. Can be said for the entire convo tho. What did the former sharks look like and how did the scientists come up with their image?

    they rely on the morphology of current sharks most of the time. From what I know, it's
    very rare to find their fossils intact. The most intact shark fossil was discovered in peru
    in 1988. Most of the fossils discovered are normally shark teeth, since their skeletons
    are made from cartilage. I have my doubts on that, especially the size estimates of the
    supposed ancient shark megalodon.
  • edwardnigmaedwardnigma Posts: 2,686
    bruh...there was no people at the time.

    and thats the fucking lie!
  • even though they find hundreds on new species a year its all lies because the bible and other culteres never mentioned such animals.
  • edwardnigmaedwardnigma Posts: 2,686
    Ms Eudoxie wrote: »
    Gravity is a law.

    ooooooooooooooohh Respect.
  • edwardnigmaedwardnigma Posts: 2,686
    even though they find hundreds on new species a year its all lies because the bible and other culteres never mentioned such animals.

    I don't believe in the bible dog, if you talking to me
  • and thats the fucking lie!

    so are you saying humans were around millions or even billions of years ago?
  • I don't believe in the bible dog, if you talking to me

    did you just try to insinuate im not real by calling me dog?
    sup bruh you got beef?
  • kai_valyakai_valya Posts: 16,575
    Ms Eudoxie wrote: »
    Gravity is a law.

    actually the rules within a theory are called "laws" and the inverse square law of the Newtonian theory of gravitation does describe gravity extremely well. a law in science describes an analytical statement, a theory is an accurate and predictive description of the natural world. to know the difference, you would actually have to take a class to learn this. and i ask you again, what's your highest level of scientific education?
  • Generic wrote: »
    they rely on the morphology of current sharks most of the time. From what I know, it's
    very rare to find their fossils intact. The most intact shark fossil was discovered in peru
    in 1988. Most of the fossils discovered are normally shark teeth, since their skeletons
    are made from cartilage. I have my doubts on that
    , especially the size estimates of the
    supposed ancient shark megalodon.

    Because a sharks body is mostly cartilage which decomposes rather quickly opposed to their teeth which can be well preserved for thousands of years which is mostly where they get their facts from.
  • BlackGeraldBlackGerald Posts: 12,115
    kai_valya wrote: »
    actually the rules within a theory are called "laws" and the inverse square law of the Newtonian theory of gravitation does describe gravity extremely well. a law in science describes an analytical statement, a theory is an accurate and predictive description of the natural world. to know the difference, you would actually have to take a class to learn this. and i ask you again, what's your highest level of scientific education?

    not necessarily true
  • Ms Eudoxie wrote: »
    Gravity is a law.
    ooooooooooooooohh Respect.
    kai_valya wrote: »
    actually the rules within a theory are called "laws" and the inverse square law of the Newtonian theory of gravitation does describe gravity extremely well. a law in science describes an analytical statement, a theory is an accurate and predictive description of the natural world. to know the difference, you would actually have to take a class to learn this. and i ask you again, what's your highest level of scientific education?

    sonned........
  • VIBEVIBE Posts: 23,175
    See I didn't know that. But I don't care what other people believe because belief is an individual thing based on your own intelligence.

    If you follow the pack, keep following.

    So what, are you insecure? Lol now your checking to see ho credible it is lol

    Think on your own sonny

    Had to make sure you weren't the only dumb one because if so, then god help you.


    how much money it can make

    what if it made no money? How did they know it would? You do realize they did find dinosaur bones wayyyyy before it they were even named 'dinosaurs'. It's just simple logic, they found the bones, had no idea wtf they were so assumed the most natural assumption, 'they're big animal bones'. I'm sure they knew what reptiles were, but they couldn't scientifically put these things together piece by piece because they didn't know how to. They probably also couldn't fathom the idea of giant dinosaurs, so the assumption that they were just giant animals is natural. There's nothing wrong with it either. That was their way of making sense of it. Do you believe the sun is a god who dies every evening when it goes down? Because there were people who thought this thousands of years ago, they were only making sense of what they thought they knew. They weren't stupid, they were just basing this off their knowledge, how the fuck were they suppose to know it wasn't a god that was dying? Remember, everything had god attached to it. The point is, they're making sense of their findings, just because they said, 'big ANIMAL bones' doesn't make it that. It makes they BIG, LARGE BONES but we now know them as dinosaur bones.

    The whole Jurassic Park thing has you fucked up, don't watch that movie any more.


    Ms Eudoxie wrote: »
    Might or must, read into it what you like.

    Sharks exist today. What did they do to survive while dino's became extinct?

    Evolution, survival of the fittest. Also, not only sharks survived but thousands of species, even dinosaurs did too, but they evolved into lesser creatures to adapt and survive.
  • Swiffness!Swiffness! Posts: 5,777
    Based on some of the arguments I've seen on the SL concerning stuff like 9/11 and The Holocaust, shouldn't some of ya'll Poor Righteous Teachers be arguing that all dinosaur fossils are fakes planted by jews and freemasons?
  • edwardnigmaedwardnigma Posts: 2,686
    VIBE86 wrote: »
    \
    what if it made no money? How did they know it would? You do realize they did find dinosaur bones wayyyyy before it they were even named 'dinosaurs'. It's just simple logic, they found the bones, had no idea wtf they were so assumed the most natural assumption, 'they're big animal bones'. I'm sure they knew what reptiles were, but they couldn't scientifically put these things together piece by piece because they didn't know how to. They probably also couldn't fathom the idea of giant dinosaurs, so the assumption that they were just giant animals is natural. There's nothing wrong with it either. That was their way of making sense of it. Do you believe the sun is a god who dies every evening when it goes down? Because there were people who thought this thousands of years ago, they were only making sense of what they thought they knew. They weren't stupid, they were just basing this off their knowledge, how the fuck were they suppose to know it wasn't a god that was dying? Remember, everything had god attached to it. The point is, they're making sense of their findings, just because they said, 'big ANIMAL bones' doesn't make it that. It makes they BIG, LARGE BONES but we now know them as dinosaur bones.

    The whole Jurassic Park thing has you fucked up, don't watch that movie any more.



    Evolution, survival of the fittest. Also, not only sharks survived but thousands of species, even dinosaurs did too, but they evolved into lesser creatures to adapt and survive.


    Everything I highlighted from you was basically an emotional rant of your opinions.

    "They had no idea what the fuck they were"- Is not a fact thats your opinion.

    "They couldn't fathom the idea of giant dinosaurs" - Lol But they could think of a Sphinx and dedicate a temple to it which is fucking Huge, Shut the fuck up buddy

    "The assumption was it was a huge animal which is natural" - Thats not an assumption, thats a fact.

    One thing you cant escape is whether Dinosaurs are real or not, they are still ANIMALS. We're not talkin about Plants.

    They called it a huge ANimal because thats whatthe fuck it was !

    If anyting, they could of said it was an anoconda, but guess what, they didn't even say it was a reptile!

    They just said it was a Huge Animal.

    Now what have I been saying.

    One more time for the short bus shortys.

    There once as a time when alot of the creatures today including us were much larger....iants even.

    Like you Me, Fiat and others have reconized because it is a fact is that.....

    there have been huge animal bones found by ancient cultures and civilizations.

    They called them.....HUGE ANIMAL BONES

    Dinosaur fossils were not discovered until the 19th century in the 1860's

    Then they(for whatever agenda they had) have been labeling what other cultures found and named HUGE ANIMALS....DINOSAURS.

    DINOSAUR Means Big Lizard or Terribe Lizard.

    Dont you think even though they didn't use the word dinosaur the would have just said Big Lzard instead of HUGE ANIMAL BONES.

    You know Lizards are not the only ANimals on earth right?

    There are Lions, Bears, Apes,Elephants....


    lol bankrupt baller gos and co signs you lol hillarious!
  • ed you might need help little buddy
  • Swiffness!Swiffness! Posts: 5,777
    Dinosaurs never existed. Its a myth invented by Jews and Freemasons.

    Read my Angelfire page for more info.
  • VIBEVIBE Posts: 23,175
    I don't understand how you cannot comprehend simple things.
This discussion has been closed.