His name is Battlezone, and he has murked three people btw.

fiat_money

BiblicalAtheist wrote: »

fiat_money wrote: »

Only the illiterate complain.

Fiat, that shit was wack.... especially for you.

Actions speak louder than words bruh.

If it's wack, click the button.


I might adblock your avi. It's weird having a bunch of your eyes facing me.



Assuming it's your eye.

.IRS.

Illiteracy... on message board....

that made no Fiat sense at all.

Yes my eye, block away.

fiat_money

Come to think of it, shit's even weirder if it's somebody elses eye.

.IRS.

I'll goat that post tho.

fiat_money

BiblicalAtheist wrote: »

Illiteracy... on message board....

that made no Fiat sense at all.

Yes my eye, block away.

Damn, perhaps I should have used "functionally illiterate" instead.

But yeh, I don't actually think a picture is somehow "worth" any tangible amount of words.

That whole post was not supposed to make sense.

Like many of my posts.

.IRS.

Its funny you even said that you know, cuz I was surfin earlier for a new one.

fiat_money

A new eye pic?

I've always had a thing for certain eyes, but seeing just one eye in repetition is off-putting.

You should use your other eye, that way things will even out.

.IRS.

Nah just a new avi.

SunflowaSeeds

I want to take this moment to congratulate BA. This is the most I've even seen Fiat go back and forth with anyone other than himself.

fiat_money

I do a lot of "back and forth" posting in religion/debate threads.

With unsolicited titangraphs and everything.

Notable example:

fiat_money wrote: »

anthony7q wrote: »

Taken from Black Roots Science E-Book


There are 125 billion trillion trillion atoms in the earth.
How many stars are there in the universe?
125 billion trillion trillion...

So I'll call bullshit here, for a few reasons in fact. Firstly, they have no way of knowing the number of stars in the universe.

Secondly, the usage of "billion trillion trillion" pretty much shows they are not familiar with scientific notation, or that this is not a true scientific publication. Instead of saying "billion trillion trillion", they could've said "decillion" or "10^33". They likely used it because it sounds like a big number.

But thirdly, and most importantly, they clearly have a limited knowledge of molecular science to say there's only 125,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 1.25x10^35 or 125 decillion atoms in the Earth.

However I won't just say that, I'll show it.

This example will use the known capacity of oil tankers to determine if "1.25x10^35" accurately represents the number of atoms in the Earth -

The minimum tonnage of a typical ULCC tanker is 320,000 tonnes. ULCC tankers actually hold up to 550,000 tonnes, but since part of that value accounts for non-oil weight, I'll use the minimum amount to be conservative. One tonne is 1000 kg, which is 1000000 grams. Therefore the typical minimum tonnage is 3.2x10^11 grams of oil. So for these calculations "T" will equal 3.2x10^11.
On average, oil is composed of 85% carbon, 12% hydrogen, 1.05% nitrogen, 0.8% oxygen, 0.55% sulfur, and less than 0.1% metal. These values will be represented by "P/100", or the percent divided by 100.

To calculate the number of atoms per mass of a substance, we use Avogrado's number (which is 6.022x10^23) and the Atomic Weight (which varies by element). The atomic weights of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur are 12.011, 1.008, 14.007, 15.999, and 32.06, respectively. These will be represented as "A" and "W". Metal will be excluded because it is both vague and will add a nominal amount of atoms to the overall total.

So, to recap:
T=3.2x10^11 grams
A=6.022x10^23
P/100 is the average percentage of an element in crude oil
W is the atomic weight of an element
N will be the number of atoms

The formula for calculating the number (N) of atoms in a mass (M) of an element is "(M/W)*A=N". In this case, M is equal to T, so the formula becomes:
(T/W)*A=N
When allowing the percentage to vary, the formula becomes:
(T/W)*A*P/100=N
When substituting the constants, the formula becomes:
((3.2x10^11)/W)*6.022x10^23*P/100=N
The final formula is derived by multiplying the constants:
((1.92704x10^35)/W)*P/100=N

Using this formula, it is calculated that, in average crude oil, there are:
1.36736575x10^34 atoms of Carbon
2.294095238x10^34 atoms of Hydrogen
1.444557721x10^32 atoms of Nitrogen
9.63580223x10^31 atoms of Oxygen
3.305901435x10^31 atoms of Sulfur

When adding them all together, the value is 36888482688749998271359957583527936 or 3.688848268874999827135995758352793x10^34.

Finally, when dividing the proposed number of atoms in the entire Earth by the number of atoms in the oil held by a typical ULCC tanker, the expression is:
(1.25x10^35)/(3.688848268874999827135995758352793x10^34)=3.388591528

From this, we can conclude that 4 ULCC tankers filled with oil carry more atoms than the amount of atoms in the entire Earth.

This, of course, is impossible. Thus, based on the first line alone, the "Black Roots Science E-Book" is bullshit.

.IRS.

I wanna give that a feelings but I don't cuz you say shit with such coldness how in the hell can it be feelings, but you out here provin yourself an shit.

fiat_money

No homo, but I enjoy re-reading that post because of the math/physics used in it.

Shit's beautiful.

SunflowaSeeds

Yo that's all simple mathematics
I eat half off rap and half off addicts

.IRS.

You're so full of shit right there^^ but there isn't anything you don't have a methodical thought for so w/e

p-tavern

The post made sense to me, and I thought that it had just gone over BA's head.
If it wasn't supposed to make sense, though, then maybe I'm just imagining things :confused

SunflowaSeeds

I wrote this diss about Biblican Atheist last night.

half ass fighter
no gear, no food, so now on the transfer your draft bag is lighter
state boots hurtin your feet
lyin bout how you was out here hurtin the street
lyin bout how your team is the strongest
meanwhile a whole fuckin dorm been feedin' ya cracca ass for the longest
in the yard you got hit by the eye
by Poppy with the old boxcutter that he hid off the thigh
woulda thought you'da killed by then
but you still played it sweet and just chilled cuz it healed up thin
and they d-blocked your trees and they blowin em crazy
damn near your whole crew is up in ya lady (DYKE!)
they already sent ya face to the doctor
and you let the brooklyn craccas break in ya locker
Live life proper

p-tavern

Also, my inability to find the classic IC :confused smiley is disheartening. That and :laff were the cream of the crop.

fiat_money

It's over, "BiblicalAtheist" is finished.

SunflowaSeeds

p-tavern wrote: »

Also, my inability to find the classic IC :confused smiley is disheartening. That and :laff were the cream of the crop.

These?

.IRS.

p-tavern wrote: »

The post made sense to me, and I thought that it had just gone over BA's head.
If it wasn't supposed to make sense, though, then maybe I'm just imagining things :confused

Or maybe I'm just messin with Fiat crazy smart brain. Guy has a smart answer for almost anything.

SunflowaSeeds

YESSSSSSSSS I LOVE THAT *right clicks*

p-tavern

SunflowaSeeds wrote: »

p-tavern wrote: »

Also, my inability to find the classic IC :confused smiley is disheartening. That and :laff were the cream of the crop.

These?

Yes. If there were a Thank You button at the bottom of posts, I would hit it 1001 times.

BiblicalAtheist wrote: »

p-tavern wrote: »

The post made sense to me, and I thought that it had just gone over BA's head.
If it wasn't supposed to make sense, though, then maybe I'm just imagining things :confused

Or maybe I'm just messin with Fiat crazy smart brain. Guy has a smart answer for almost anything.

I thought you were after reading your initial response, but then the second one made me think otherwise

SunflowaSeeds

Wanting a "thank you" button is one thing, but giving multiple thanks to one post is just getting greedy.

:confused was always my favorite though, that's why I made the gif of myself doing it. I should have painted my face blue on some Tobias Fünke shit though.

.IRS.

p-tavern wrote: »

I thought you were after reading your initial response, but then the second one made me think otherwise

That's what I'm saying tho, you can say any crazy shit and he's got a good answer for it.

p-tavern

SunflowaSeeds wrote: »

Wanting a "thank you" button is one thing, but giving multiple thanks to one post is just getting greedy.

:confused was always my favorite though, that's why I made the gif of myself doing it. I should have painted my face blue on some Tobias Fünke shit though.

:confused was always the GOAT to me as well. :laff wasn't too special on its own merits, but the way it was used in Donkey when it first came around was humorous in itself.

Its never too late to redo the .gif

BiblicalAtheist wrote: »

p-tavern wrote: »

I thought you were after reading your initial response, but then the second one made me think otherwise

That's what I'm saying tho, you can say any crazy shit and he's got a good answer for it.

Who is that in your new av? It looks like Manson if he didn't sleep for a few days, or if he was arrested while playing a raccoon in a school play about littering.