More Likely to Win A Championship first... Tony Romo or Joe Flacco??

13468911

Replies

  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?
  • coop9889coop9889 Posts: 4,341
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?

    Their first matchup of the season last year.

    Romo went 21/31 for 321 yards, 4 TDs no INTs.

    Like I said YOU DONT WATCH THE GAMES.

    You don't know shit.
  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    coop9889 wrote: »
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?

    Their first matchup of the season last year.

    Romo went 21/31 for 321 yards, 4 TDs no INTs.

    Like I said YOU DONT WATCH THE GAMES.

    You don't know shit.

    And who won the game? dont mean shit when you lose the game just padding the stats bruh now who dont know shit? lol....oh yeah eli threw for 400 that game so who torched who? lol
  • coop9889coop9889 Posts: 4,341
    coop9889 wrote: »
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?

    Their first matchup of the season last year.

    Romo went 21/31 for 321 yards, 4 TDs no INTs.

    Like I said YOU DONT WATCH THE GAMES.

    You don't know shit.

    And who won the game? dont mean shit when you lose the game just padding the stats bruh now who dont know shit? lol....oh yeah eli threw for 400 that game so who torched who? lol

    No one said Eli didnt torch the Cowboys D. EVERYBODY TORCHED THE COWBOYS D.

    We are talkin bout Romo. Romo had a better game. I'll take 321 yards 4TDs 0 Ints over 400 yards 2 TDs and 1Int anyday.

    I was just answering your dumbass question, which further solidified my judgement of you... a dumbass.
  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?

    Their first matchup of the season last year.

    Romo went 21/31 for 321 yards, 4 TDs no INTs.

    Like I said YOU DONT WATCH THE GAMES.

    You don't know shit.

    And who won the game? dont mean shit when you lose the game just padding the stats bruh now who dont know shit? lol....oh yeah eli threw for 400 that game so who torched who? lol

    No one said Eli didnt torch the Cowboys D. EVERYBODY TORCHED THE COWBOYS D.

    We are talkin bout Romo. Romo had a better game. I'll take 321 yards 4TDs 0 Ints over 400 yards 2 TDs and 1Int anyday.

    I was just answering your dumbass question, which further solidified my judgement of you... a dumbass.

    You'll take those numbers with a loss too huh? lol silly ass nigga
  • coop9889coop9889 Posts: 4,341
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?

    Their first matchup of the season last year.

    Romo went 21/31 for 321 yards, 4 TDs no INTs.

    Like I said YOU DONT WATCH THE GAMES.

    You don't know shit.

    And who won the game? dont mean shit when you lose the game just padding the stats bruh now who dont know shit? lol....oh yeah eli threw for 400 that game so who torched who? lol

    No one said Eli didnt torch the Cowboys D. EVERYBODY TORCHED THE COWBOYS D.

    We are talkin bout Romo. Romo had a better game. I'll take 321 yards 4TDs 0 Ints over 400 yards 2 TDs and 1Int anyday.

    I was just answering your dumbass question, which further solidified my judgement of you... a dumbass.

    You'll take those numbers with a loss too huh? lol silly ass nigga

    I will take Romo's performance over Eli's performance.

    That is my point, what are you not getting? You are still stuck on the quarterback being the only reason a team wins or loses.

    You are quickly rising to the top of the list of dumbest niggas in cheap seats. Seriously.
  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »
    Matt Ryan over Romo???

    The falcons didn't score not one point against the giants in the playoffs NOT ONE lol

    Romo torched the Giants D on the other hand...yall trolling hard in here now

    When did this happen?

    Their first matchup of the season last year.

    Romo went 21/31 for 321 yards, 4 TDs no INTs.

    Like I said YOU DONT WATCH THE GAMES.

    You don't know shit.

    And who won the game? dont mean shit when you lose the game just padding the stats bruh now who dont know shit? lol....oh yeah eli threw for 400 that game so who torched who? lol

    No one said Eli didnt torch the Cowboys D. EVERYBODY TORCHED THE COWBOYS D.

    We are talkin bout Romo. Romo had a better game. I'll take 321 yards 4TDs 0 Ints over 400 yards 2 TDs and 1Int anyday.

    I was just answering your dumbass question, which further solidified my judgement of you... a dumbass.

    You'll take those numbers with a loss too huh? lol silly ass nigga

    I will take Romo's performance over Eli's performance.

    That is my point, what are you not getting? You are still stuck on the quarterback being the only reason a team wins or loses.

    You are quickly rising to the top of the list of dumbest niggas in cheap seats. Seriously.

    So you're saying you would take the loss too that came with it and I'm the dumbass? lol....smh dont salty at me because felix jones ran for 106 yards with no damn td's lol
  • coop9889coop9889 Posts: 4,341
    edited July 2012
    coop9889 wrote: »

    I will take Romo's performance over Eli's performance.

    That is my point, what are you not getting? You are still stuck on the quarterback being the only reason a team wins or loses.

    You are quickly rising to the top of the list of dumbest niggas in cheap seats. Seriously.

    So you're saying you would take the loss too that came with it and I'm the dumbass? lol....smh dont salty at me because felix jones ran for 106 yards with no damn td's lol

    Show me where I said I'd take the loss, fool.
  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    edited July 2012
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »

    I will take Romo's performance over Eli's performance.

    That is my point, what are you not getting? You are still stuck on the quarterback being the only reason a team wins or loses.

    You are quickly rising to the top of the list of dumbest niggas in cheap seats. Seriously.

    So you're saying you would take the loss too that came with it and I'm the dumbass? lol....smh dont salty at me because felix jones ran for 106 yards with no damn td's lol

    Show me where I said I'd take the loss, fool.

    You said you would take romo's performance over eli's even though romo lost so indirectly you're saying you would take the loss that came with his numbers......oh that play on 3rd and 5 when romo over threw the ball to austin.....that could've been game but nope he gave the giants a second chance
  • coop9889coop9889 Posts: 4,341
    edited July 2012
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »

    I will take Romo's performance over Eli's performance.

    That is my point, what are you not getting? You are still stuck on the quarterback being the only reason a team wins or loses.

    You are quickly rising to the top of the list of dumbest niggas in cheap seats. Seriously.

    So you're saying you would take the loss too that came with it and I'm the dumbass? lol....smh dont salty at me because felix jones ran for 106 yards with no damn td's lol

    Show me where I said I'd take the loss, fool.

    You said you would take romo's performance over eli's even though romo lost so indirectly you're saying you would take the loss that came with his numbers......oh that play on 3rd and 5 when romo over threw the ball to austin.....that could've been game but nope he gave the giants a second chance

    That's stupid, incorrect logic.

    With every post your lack of intelligence gets clearer and clearer.

    The whole point of the conversation is comparing the QBs performances.

    And Romo did better than Eli. The GIANTS did better than COWBOYS. Thats the difference.

    Stop postin.
  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »
    coop9889 wrote: »

    I will take Romo's performance over Eli's performance.

    That is my point, what are you not getting? You are still stuck on the quarterback being the only reason a team wins or loses.

    You are quickly rising to the top of the list of dumbest niggas in cheap seats. Seriously.

    So you're saying you would take the loss too that came with it and I'm the dumbass? lol....smh dont salty at me because felix jones ran for 106 yards with no damn td's lol

    Show me where I said I'd take the loss, fool.

    You said you would take romo's performance over eli's even though romo lost so indirectly you're saying you would take the loss that came with his numbers......oh that play on 3rd and 5 when romo over threw the ball to austin.....that could've been game but nope he gave the giants a second chance

    With every post your lack of intelligence gets clearer and clearer.

    The whole point of the conversation is comparing the QBs performances.

    And Romo did better than Eli. The GIANTS did better than COWBOYS. Thats the difference.

    Stop postin.

    ok enjoy your loss with that too
  • FlyFreeCtFlyFreeCt Posts: 3,608
    dbrazil412 wrote: »
    FlyFreeCt wrote: »
    Shizlansky wrote: »
    Romo couldn't even get in the playoffs when the team in they division only won 9 games.

    Rodgers, Brees, Brady, Peyton, Eli, Ben, Ryan, Flacco, Vick, Rivers, Stafford, and maybe Cam.

    That's 12 QB's ill take over Romo.

    I'd take all of them over Romo except Ryan, Flacco and Ben...Romo and Vick is a tossup, but I'd take Vick cuz of the dynamic factor that makes defenses gameplan for him...


    that still makes romo a top 10 qb..


    the first 6 guys dude mentioned all have won a superbowl.. so basically romo is just in the next tier of guys.. ala not what some would consider 'elite'


    if the cowboys win the superbowl this year, romo will be an elite qb easily.. yall actin like we're talkin bout kevin kolb or some shit

    I think Romo is top 10 no doubt, but some niggas in here acting like he the best fuckin thing since sliced bread...I mean damn, he's good but not nearly as good as some are making him out to be..He's actually at 7 on my list...I hate Romo and the Cowboys but I was one of the 1st people to say that the season they had this past year was not his fault, cuz I actually watch the games and I'm a realist..Dallas' defense (mostly the secondary) was why they weren't successful...I'm a fan of the game and call it like I see it every time..
    dallas' 4 eva
  • ShizlanskyShizlansky Posts: 11,131
    You can be a top 10 QB and still be so far from the top.

    Rodgers
    Brees
    Brady
    Peyton
    Eli
    Ben
    Rivers

    These QBs is so far ahead of him on what they have did. And besides Ben all has played with a bad defense and still made the playoffs.
  • dbrazil412dbrazil412 Posts: 8,337
    Shizlansky wrote: »
    You can be a top 10 QB and still be so far from the top.

    Rodgers
    Brees
    Brady
    Peyton
    Eli
    Ben
    Rivers

    These QBs is so far ahead of him on what they have did. And besides Ben all has played with a bad defense and still made the playoffs.


    all those guys got rings except rivers. i'm saying if romo does finally get that ring, the numbers he has put up already in his career would make him an elite qb.

  • ShizlanskyShizlansky Posts: 11,131
    edited July 2012
    Son got to at least win some December games first and then some playoffs games.
  • BlackxChildBlackxChild Posts: 2,168
    Felix also fumbled in the redzone and their was a punt block and a missed field goal in that same game where Romo threw for 4tds 0 int... Thething is Romo did more than Eli im that game but his team fucked it up...

    Winning and losing is not a Qb statistic its a TEAM statistic so yea Id take Romos game against a tough Defense over Elis against a weak Defense. Most of Elis yds came off of Terrence Newman fuckups where he was hurrdled by a 290 lb TE and Cruz torched him 20 yds down the field in 2 seconds and went on for a TD it was more Terrence NewmN playing bad than Eli playing good.
  • vageneral08vageneral08 Posts: 12,788
    Bottom line dallas was one pass away from winning the game and but it was over thrown.....no matter what his numbers are it only takes one play to fuck everything up
  • dallas' 4 evadallas' 4 eva Posts: 2,709
    edited July 2012
    FlyFreeCt wrote: »
    dbrazil412 wrote: »
    FlyFreeCt wrote: »
    Shizlansky wrote: »
    Romo couldn't even get in the playoffs when the team in they division only won 9 games.

    Rodgers, Brees, Brady, Peyton, Eli, Ben, Ryan, Flacco, Vick, Rivers, Stafford, and maybe Cam.

    That's 12 QB's ill take over Romo.

    I'd take all of them over Romo except Ryan, Flacco and Ben...Romo and Vick is a tossup, but I'd take Vick cuz of the dynamic factor that makes defenses gameplan for him...


    that still makes romo a top 10 qb..


    the first 6 guys dude mentioned all have won a superbowl.. so basically romo is just in the next tier of guys.. ala not what some would consider 'elite'


    if the cowboys win the superbowl this year, romo will be an elite qb easily.. yall actin like we're talkin bout kevin kolb or some shit

    I think Romo is top 10 no doubt, but some niggas in here acting like he the best fuckin thing since sliced bread...I mean damn, he's good but not nearly as good as some are making him out to be..He's actually at 7 on my list...I hate Romo and the Cowboys but I was one of the 1st people to say that the season they had this past year was not his fault, cuz I actually watch the games and I'm a realist..Dallas' defense (mostly the secondary) was why they weren't successful...I'm a fan of the game and call it like I see it every time..

    I'm going to give you a GOAT for that, even though you are a Giants fan. Finally I think somebody realizes the point that we have been trying to make. Something Vageneral08 doesn't seem to be able to comprehend.
  • ShizlanskyShizlansky Posts: 11,131
    I like Romo. Hell I live in Arlington right next to the spaceship of dome/stadium and gon go to game this year.

    Romo gets to much hate but he needs to win late late in the season to be considered a great player.

    He dont need a ring but some playoff wins would be good for him.
  • greenwood1921greenwood1921 Posts: 31,345
    Blake Bell >>>> all these niggas.












    lol @ niggas that think wins and losses are mostly based on one player on a 53 man roster.

    Keep drinkin the koolaid, chirren.
  • dbrazil412dbrazil412 Posts: 8,337
    Bottom line dallas was one pass away from winning the game and but it was over thrown.....no matter what his numbers are it only takes one play to fuck everything up

    were we, or were we not winning that game by 14 late in the 4th quarter during that game??

    coop9889
  • dbrazil412dbrazil412 Posts: 8,337
    romo did everything he could to win us that game, and our defense didnt back him up.. plain and simple.
  • dallas' 4 evadallas' 4 eva Posts: 2,709
    dbrazil412 wrote: »
    Bottom line dallas was one pass away from winning the game and but it was over thrown.....no matter what his numbers are it only takes one play to fuck everything up

    were we, or were we not winning that game by 14 late in the 4th quarter during that game??

    Yup, up 14 with all of what 5 minutes left. Defense couldn't hold a two touchdown lead for FIVE FUCKING MINUTES. And even on that pass, Miles Austin said he lost sight of the ball in the lights so slowed down on his route to not over run the pass. But they won't remember that will they. Our defense has frustrated me more than any other aspect of our team for an incredibly long time. If Jason Garretts, play calling continues the way it has it may become an issue as well(icing your own kicker, in the Pats game a draw play on 3rd and 15 when you need the first down to run off clock, a shovel pass on a 4th and goal play).

    Obviously they don't watch all the leads our defense blows.
  • ShizlanskyShizlansky Posts: 11,131
    If Brees got the ball up 14 in the 4th with less then 5 minutes to go, the other team ain't gon see the rock. Or he gon put the dagger in they heart.
  • ShizlanskyShizlansky Posts: 11,131
    @greewood

    Win and losses are mostly based on that one player on a 53 man roster

    QB is the most important player in any sport
    greenwood1921
Sign In or Register to comment.