The thread title statement is more of a question.
I'm far from being an economist and I've always thought that Reaganomics was bad, but I recently learned that under Reagan, the American economy prospered and grew, including the decline of unemployment and inflation rates and the incline of entrepreneurship. Apparently, this success even continued throughout the Bush Sr. and Clinton days.
Some things of course worsened under Reagan economic-wise, but it seemed like nothing catastrophic happened (the crack epidemic was mostly a socio-political issue imo). It does seem, however, that the economy under the Reagan days could've been even better if a couple of social and educational programs were implemented. But that might be neither here nor there.
So does this all of this generally justify Reaganomics (and perhaps laissez-faire by association?) as a legitimate and productive economic system? This might've been touched on a little bit in that Thomas Sowell appreciation thread, so I'm curious at the least to know what
@jono and
@High Revolutionary think of all of this.
0 • •
Replies
Also, the crack epidemic isn't divorced from the impoverishment and economic hardships brought on by Reaganomics. People suffered from joblessness due to outsourcing and deregulation created by administration's economic policies, and many people suffered from depression and personal issues as a result. Crack economies arose because of the lack of available jobs for people, and then came along crack addiction.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
2 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign 1Ether 1GOAT LOL •I guess when you read between the lines, Reaganomics did do a lot of bad. And I agree with what you said about the crack epidemic too. Society and economy are inseperably linked.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether 1GOAT LOL •I think he's to blame for much of the economic problems that we have today.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •If the goal is to create and consolidate power within a small, rich ruling class and establish or reinforce a poor working class then yeah - "Reaganomics" works very well.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign 1Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether 1GOAT LOL •the increase in the size of government
the change in the value of the dollar
all played a role in the "success" of Reagonomics?
how ironic Reagan promoted laissez-faire ideals while the govt grew exponentially because of the War on Drugs
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign 1Ether GOAT LOL •