What's up everybody! Just a quick message. We will be relaunching AllHipHop.com with the goal of keeping the community front and center. I have worked with Jamal and select moderators, to make sure The Illl Community's needs are being addressed as we evolve. We are encouraging you to use the new platform.

We will NOT be closing the current community, but we will be porting user data over to the new system over time, so please get used to using the new community!

We will be working on it every single day until it's exactly what you want!

Please feel free to join now, test, as we are in beta:

https://www.allhiphop.com

Official Star Wars Cinematic Universe Thread: Coming Soon : Ep VIII - The Last Jedi (15 Dec)

19192939496

Replies

  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 18
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.

    The fuck the Sulu Gay thing was very very understated and if you aint really looking for it you will miss it. And probably thats more accurate about the future than just having straight people running shit in the future.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

    DarthRozay
  • StoneColdMikeyStoneColdMikey mikeyismod CHITOWN THE BEST TOWNPosts: 33,297 Regulator
    The title for the Han Solo movie sucks.
    #Mikeyismod2017
    Betasapp08_2001fortyacresillestni99ainne
  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.

    The fuck the Sulu Gay thing was very very understated and if you aint really looking for it you will miss it. And probably thats more accurate about the future than just having straight people running shit in the future.

    Yeah it wasn't that much implied but i'm saying why make a well known character who wasn't originally gay do that when they coul'dve just had a gay extra? It would've served the same purpose.
  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • BetaBeta #FastFamily Posts: 64,694 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The title for the Han Solo movie sucks.

    Shoulda called it 12 parsecs
    justise-winslow-dunk-shot-science.gif?w=418

    giphy.gif


    Focal Point
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    Beta wrote: »
    The title for the Han Solo movie sucks.

    Shoulda called it 12 parsecs

    that scene wont live up to the hype if its in this movie bet that.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

    Beta
  • BetaBeta #FastFamily Posts: 64,694 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Beta wrote: »
    The title for the Han Solo movie sucks.

    Shoulda called it 12 parsecs

    that scene wont live up to the hype if its in this movie bet that.

    Lol why not
    justise-winslow-dunk-shot-science.gif?w=418

    giphy.gif


  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    Beta wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Beta wrote: »
    The title for the Han Solo movie sucks.

    Shoulda called it 12 parsecs

    that scene wont live up to the hype if its in this movie bet that.

    Lol why not

    its been hyped so much in star wars/movie lore, that it will have to be some shit we have never seen before on screen and i dont think it would be more than just a pedestrian race.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

    Beta
  • BetaBeta #FastFamily Posts: 64,694 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Beta wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Beta wrote: »
    The title for the Han Solo movie sucks.

    Shoulda called it 12 parsecs

    that scene wont live up to the hype if its in this movie bet that.

    Lol why not

    its been hyped so much in star wars/movie lore, that it will have to be some shit we have never seen before on screen and i dont think it would be more than just a pedestrian race.

    Lol well the kessel run if you break it down was han transporting spice or some shit while in hyperspace


    At the most you might get

    tenor.gif
    justise-winslow-dunk-shot-science.gif?w=418

    giphy.gif


  • Nomad1Nomad1 Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.

    The fuck the Sulu Gay thing was very very understated and if you aint really looking for it you will miss it. And probably thats more accurate about the future than just having straight people running shit in the future.

    Yeah it wasn't that much implied but i'm saying why make a well known character who wasn't originally gay do that when they coul'dve just had a gay extra? It would've served the same purpose.

    B/c Sulu really was gay and a gay advocate...at least the guy that played him so they made it a thing. #thegoddamnagenda
  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nomad1 wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.

    The fuck the Sulu Gay thing was very very understated and if you aint really looking for it you will miss it. And probably thats more accurate about the future than just having straight people running shit in the future.

    Yeah it wasn't that much implied but i'm saying why make a well known character who wasn't originally gay do that when they coul'dve just had a gay extra? It would've served the same purpose.

    B/c Sulu really was gay and a gay advocate...at least the guy that played him so they made it a thing. #thegoddamnagenda

    You idiot i already stated that the original actor hated the dicision to make sulu gay. In another post
    Valentinez A. Kaiser
  • Nomad1Nomad1 Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
    Nomad1 wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.

    The fuck the Sulu Gay thing was very very understated and if you aint really looking for it you will miss it. And probably thats more accurate about the future than just having straight people running shit in the future.

    Yeah it wasn't that much implied but i'm saying why make a well known character who wasn't originally gay do that when they coul'dve just had a gay extra? It would've served the same purpose.

    B/c Sulu really was gay and a gay advocate...at least the guy that played him so they made it a thing. #thegoddamnagenda

    You idiot i already stated that the original actor hated the dicision to make sulu gay. In another post

    And you think I give a shit to research your posts?
  • Nomad1Nomad1 Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
    the question was rhetorical btw
  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nomad1 wrote: »
    Nomad1 wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    I don't know about this having the same dude be behind the Star Trek and Star Wars movies. We don't need the two series basically becoming the same thing. I mean the Trek movies have already lost most of the Trek and mostly become generic space based movies. I enjoyed them, but they don't really capture the spirit of the series at all.

    Who cares most of the old movies were boring any way and insurrection was a flop, the only good movies was wrath of khan, the voyage home, the undiscovered country, and generations. I never saw star trek nemesis either. The first two star trek reboot movies were good. The third one was slightly over the top but it wasnt bad either.My only problem with the reboot is they made sulu gay to push the agenda. Even the original sulu didnt like it . They could've made a random red shirt extra gay if they wanted to do that.I'm not feeling zoe saldana as lt. Uhura either.They shoul've gotten a no name actress to play that role.

    The fuck the Sulu Gay thing was very very understated and if you aint really looking for it you will miss it. And probably thats more accurate about the future than just having straight people running shit in the future.

    Yeah it wasn't that much implied but i'm saying why make a well known character who wasn't originally gay do that when they coul'dve just had a gay extra? It would've served the same purpose.

    B/c Sulu really was gay and a gay advocate...at least the guy that played him so they made it a thing. #thegoddamnagenda

    You idiot i already stated that the original actor hated the dicision to make sulu gay. In another post

    And you think I give a shit to research your posts?
    Nomad1 wrote: »
    the question was rhetorical btw

    Shut up
  • Nomad1Nomad1 Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
    I don't think I'll like this movie but I'll still go see it
  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The old republic perhaps? There's no other direction they can go with a new trilogy
    texas409sapp08_2001
  • texas409texas409 Posts: 20,697 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »

    They haven't even finished this saga yet and they already planning on more shit. This is all a big money grab
    StoneColdMikey
  • SplackavelliSplackavelli I'll getchu bitch!!! Somewhere drunk off my ass.Posts: 18,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    texas409 wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »

    They haven't even finished this saga yet and they already planning on more shit. This is all a big money grab

    Its dismey
    Valentinez A. Kaiser
Sign In or Register to comment.