What's up everybody! Just a quick message. We will be relaunching AllHipHop.com with the goal of keeping the community front and center. I have worked with Jamal and select moderators, to make sure The Illl Community's needs are being addressed as we evolve. We are encouraging you to use the new platform.

We will NOT be closing the current community, but we will be porting user data over to the new system over time, so please get used to using the new community!

We will be working on it every single day until it's exactly what you want!

Please feel free to join now, test, as we are in beta:

https://www.allhiphop.com

Hollywood Sex Abuse Scandal Thread - Harvey , Kevin, Andy etc

15961636465

Replies

  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    Heard Lars Von Trier might be next im really not surprised lol

    Surprised that Hiphop musicians aint been exposed like that yet, coz im pretty sure there has been some really questionable behaviour in the culture

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

  • White_Owl_WillieWhite_Owl_Willie Posts: 210 ✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Heard Lars Von Trier might be next im really not surprised lol

    Surprised that Hiphop musicians aint been exposed like that yet, coz im pretty sure there has been some really questionable behaviour in the culture

    Not exactly hip-hop, but Chris Stokes has had pedo allegations against him for years. LA Reid was facing sexual harassment allegations awhile back. Afrika Bambaataa. What's done in the dark eventually comes to the light (no AccompanyMeToHeaven).
  • dontdiedontkillanyondontdiedontkillanyon Show me some love, you losers. Posts: 10,038 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 14
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Heard Lars Von Trier might be next im really not surprised lol

    Surprised that Hiphop musicians aint been exposed like that yet, coz im pretty sure there has been some really questionable behaviour in the culture

    Already mentioned Lars Von Trier on here, though I wouldn't be surprised if there was more dirt. Björk has already aired him out twice (in detail) with the backing of her manager, plus the likes of Nicole Kidman and Paul Bettany absolutely despise him. He's been known in the past to treat actors like shit and Cannes already banned him for antisemitism.

    https://www.facebook.com/bjork/posts/10155782628166460

    Edit: Just had a look and yeah, there's more women coming out against him. The man is fucked.
    atribecalledgabiDarthRozay
  • Like WaterLike Water Integrity 1st Posts: 5,180 ✭✭✭✭✭
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
    The jungle creed says the strongest feed on any prey that it can
    And I was branded beast at every feast before I ever became a man...
    onetoughmiracle
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    This is kinda a false equivalency

    RDJ had to do much more with less.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

  • dontdiedontkillanyondontdiedontkillanyon Show me some love, you losers. Posts: 10,038 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lars von Trier’s Production Company Faces Sexual-Harassment Allegations

    After Björk claimed the Danish director sexually harassed her on the set of Dancer in the Dark, numerous women are accusing von Trier’s company of creating a hostile work environment.

    Lars-Von-Trier-Sexual-Harassment.jpg

    Weeks after Björk accused director Lars von Trier of harassing her on the set of the 2000 film Dancer in the Dark, nine women who worked for von Trier’s production company are claiming that it was a hostile environment full of degradation and sexual harassment, per Variety. The claims were originally published in a report by Danish newspaper Politiken.

    The women who came forward allege that Zentropa, a Scandinavian company von Trier co-founded with Peter Aalbæk Jensen, was a toxic place to work. Former employees claim that Jansen groped their breasts and spanked them. He used the company Christmas party, they allege, as a platform for “several sexually degrading acts.”

    “I think that everyone who has been employed by Zentropa has been exposed to or witnessed certain things—both sexually charged acts and bullying or ‘teasing.’ All of this was an ingrained part of the culture,” said Meta Louise Foldager Sørensen, a producer who worked there from 2006 to 2010. She co-produced the von Trier films Antichrist and Melancholia.

    Anne Mette Lundtofte, a writer who worked there for three years and published the book Zentropia, said she “saw women being degraded” in a workplace that reinforced “an old-fashioned, patriarchal power structure.”

    Aalbæk Jensen told Politiken he has “no interest in submission and humiliation [but he’s] interested in challenging boundaries, even up to the red line.”

    Anders Kjærhauge, the company’s managing director, told Politiken the allegations “are personal experiences and I am sad that this is how they feel, but this is not the Zentropa I know.”

    He said that the company is working with its employees to establish clear guidelines moving forward. “We will initiate a process with our employees in order to prepare a more clear vision in regards to what is a good working place. Zentropa has always been an act of balance between art and business, between rules and chaos, between women and men, between challenging boundaries and respecting boundaries, and so forth. The various discussions and writings in Denmark has made it clear to us that we need to make a ‘service check’ on our act of balance.”

    The company’s management also released a statement on Monday: “The company culture at Zentropa will continue to be colourful and alterative, but we do not wish to violate anyone’s rights or insult anyone.”

    Representatives for von Trier have not responded to Vanity Fair’s request for comment.

    The allegations arrive a few weeks after Björk posted a lengthy Facebook message alleging that she was sexually harassed when she starred in Dancer in the Dark, though she did not explicitly name either the director or the film. (Instead, she alluded to a “Danish director” on a film set; Björk has appeared in just a handful of feature films, and just one, Dancer in the Dark, was directed by a Dane.) In her message, Björk was immediately uncomfortable, alleging that “humiliation” and sexual harassment were a routine part of the job.

    "I became aware of that it is a universal thing that a director can touch and harass his actresses at will and the institution of film allows it,” she wrote.

    Von Trier soon denied her allegations. “That is not the case—although we didn’t get along, that’s a fact. . . . On the other hand, she delivered one of the greatest-ever performances in my movies,” he told Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, via Variety.

    His denial emboldened Björk to double down on her claims. She responded by writing a second Facebook post, this time detailing von Trier’s alleged behavior, including unwanted touching, violent behavior, inappropriate sexual offers, and “fabricated” rumors that painted her as a difficult star to work with—pointing directly to the false report that she ate her own shirt during production.

    “If being difficult is standing up to being treated like that, I’ll own it,” she wrote. Also: “I have never eaten a shirt. Not sure that is even possible.”

    https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/11/lars-von-trier-production-company-zentropa-allegations
  • Idiopathic JokerIdiopathic Joker PISTOL GRIP PUMP IN MY LAP AT ALL TIMES Working On My LowriderPosts: 45,113 Regulator
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on
    Fuck you, I'm a mod
    Like Water
  • Idiopathic JokerIdiopathic Joker PISTOL GRIP PUMP IN MY LAP AT ALL TIMES Working On My LowriderPosts: 45,113 Regulator
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular
    Fuck you, I'm a mod
    freshb651
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    edited November 14
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    People were gonna see Spiderman anyways after his performance in Civil War. He's Spiderman. The franchise for Marvel.

    It was a stale franchise on its 3rd reboot with an unknown kid star they needed a big draw , thus the joint deal with Sony & Marvel/Disney, for them to do something fresh with it to ensure success this is why RDJ was brought onboard to help sell this movie , this is well documented.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

    onetoughmiracle
  • Idiopathic JokerIdiopathic Joker PISTOL GRIP PUMP IN MY LAP AT ALL TIMES Working On My LowriderPosts: 45,113 Regulator
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    People were gonna see Spiderman anyways after his performance in Civil War. He's Spiderman. The franchise for Marvel.

    It was a stale franchise on its 3rd reboot with an unknown kid star they needed a big draw , thus the joint deal with Sony & Marvel/Disney, for them to do something fresh with it to ensure success this is why RDJ was brought onboard to help sell this movie , this is well documented.

    So just Spiderman making his debut in the mcu, something all spidey fans been dreaming about, wasn't going to sell alone? Ok.
    Fuck you, I'm a mod
  • usmarin3usmarin3 Posts: 37,968 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    What the fuck is you speaking about Bruh. R. Downey was an established A list actor before taking on Iron Man. Gal Gadot was a supporting role actress before even getting that role. She can easily be replaced just like there has been many reincarnation of Batman, Superman,etc. These comic book movies are all plug and play imo. They're gonna make money no matter what if the script is good. Lets see how Gadot do leading a movie that's not Wonder Woman.
    banksy-gifs-graffiti.gif
    I believe in L.O.V.E.......Lots Of Vagina Ev[/b]eryday.
    onetoughmiracle
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    People were gonna see Spiderman anyways after his performance in Civil War. He's Spiderman. The franchise for Marvel.

    It was a stale franchise on its 3rd reboot with an unknown kid star they needed a big draw , thus the joint deal with Sony & Marvel/Disney, for them to do something fresh with it to ensure success this is why RDJ was brought onboard to help sell this movie , this is well documented.

    So just Spiderman making his debut in the mcu, something all spidey fans been dreaming about, wasn't going to sell alone? Ok.

    Dude wachu want from me? Kevin Fiege said that shit, its a marketing strategy that they employed.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

    (ob)Scene
  • Idiopathic JokerIdiopathic Joker PISTOL GRIP PUMP IN MY LAP AT ALL TIMES Working On My LowriderPosts: 45,113 Regulator
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    What the fuck is you speaking about Bruh. R. Downey was an established A list actor before taking on Iron Man. Gal Gadot was a supporting role actress before even getting that role. She can easily be replaced just like there has been many reincarnation of Batman, Superman,etc. These comic book movies are all plug and play imo. They're gonna make money no matter what if the script is good. Lets see how Gadot do leading a movie that's not Wonder Woman.

    Stop talking out your ass. She's known around the world as WW. She is the DC franchise and she will get her way. If you really think recasting her tomorrow will be anything short of a franchise killer, you way off.
    Fuck you, I'm a mod
  • GhostdenithegawdGhostdenithegawd Up from da 36 chambers HarlemPosts: 15,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    That's not true at all it was a mutually beneficial thing for both company's
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    That's not true at all it was a mutually beneficial thing for both company's


    im just telling you what was reported from the writing of this movie and Kevin Fiege, the trailers & Posters were RDJ heavy to sell the movie even though is in it for like 30 minutes. RDJ is the biggest draw in the MCU thats why he get are larger cheque than everyone else combined.

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

  • Idiopathic JokerIdiopathic Joker PISTOL GRIP PUMP IN MY LAP AT ALL TIMES Working On My LowriderPosts: 45,113 Regulator
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    That's not true at all it was a mutually beneficial thing for both company's


    im just telling you what was reported from the writing of this movie and Kevin Fiege, the trailers & Posters were RDJ heavy to sell the movie even though is in it for like 30 minutes. RDJ is the biggest draw in the MCU thats why he get are larger cheque than everyone else combined.

    You think Iron Man 4 would outsell Captain America 4?
    Fuck you, I'm a mod
  • fortyacresfortyacres Posts: 4,175 Regulator
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    That's not true at all it was a mutually beneficial thing for both company's


    im just telling you what was reported from the writing of this movie and Kevin Fiege, the trailers & Posters were RDJ heavy to sell the movie even though is in it for like 30 minutes. RDJ is the biggest draw in the MCU thats why he get are larger cheque than everyone else combined.

    You think Iron Man 4 would outsell Captain America 4?

    I dont know , i dont really deal in hypotheticals.

    and at this point marvel can put out a 2 hrs movie literally about feaces and it would gross atleast $200mill plus...

    404_thanksobama.gif
    source.gif

  • jay83jay83 Posts: 5,490 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    That's not true at all it was a mutually beneficial thing for both company's


    im just telling you what was reported from the writing of this movie and Kevin Fiege, the trailers & Posters were RDJ heavy to sell the movie even though is in it for like 30 minutes. RDJ is the biggest draw in the MCU thats why he get are larger cheque than everyone else combined.

    You think Iron Man 4 would outsell Captain America 4?


    Iron man 3 pretty much left a bad taste in that franchise.

    Maybe its just me but Im experiencing superhero fatigue. Just waiting on black panther and after that not too excited about the other ones.
    1325192299_surfing_fail.gif

    onetoughmiracle
  • BroddieBroddie just me and my bitch NYCPosts: 10,931 ✭✭✭✭✭
    jay83 wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    fortyacres wrote: »
    Like Water wrote: »
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
    dnyce215 wrote: »

    Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.

    Bitch thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.

    No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.

    Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.

    I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on

    nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.

    He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular

    the numbers dont support your argument

    Iron Man 3
    $409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)

    Iron Man 2
    $312,433,331

    Iron Man
    $318,412,101


    Captain America
    $176,654,505

    Cap:Winter Soldier
    $259,766,572

    Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
    $408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)


    they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it

    That's not true at all it was a mutually beneficial thing for both company's


    im just telling you what was reported from the writing of this movie and Kevin Fiege, the trailers & Posters were RDJ heavy to sell the movie even though is in it for like 30 minutes. RDJ is the biggest draw in the MCU thats why he get are larger cheque than everyone else combined.

    You think Iron Man 4 would outsell Captain America 4?


    Iron man 3 pretty much left a bad taste in that franchise.

    Maybe its just me but Im experiencing superhero fatigue. Just waiting on black panther and after that not too excited about the other ones.

    I was never a big Black Panther fan. Actually if you find him in my collection it's in Fantastic Four comics more often than not. But I will definitely be there to support Coogler, Jordan and the concept of a Black superhero even if I never really cared for him.

    Funny too cause I grew up reading Thor comics and haven't even bothered with the new movie. I do think superhero movie fatigue has hit me as well. Been that way for the last 5 years or so for me. I seldom watch superhero movies anymore especially in theaters.
    2604vgo.jpg

    R.I.P. Darwyn Cooke
    onetoughmiracle
Sign In or Register to comment.