Racially Motivated Threads of the Social Lounge...

13567326

Replies

  • DarcSkies777DarcSkies777 Posts: 5,603 ✭✭✭
    edited January 2010
    Because that's what liars do...lie.
  • edeeesqedeeesq Posts: 511
    edited January 2010
    Don't you realize that whites are simply being oppressed!!!! They used to be able to discriminate and be as prejudical as they wanted - NOW its all about rules and respect....

    Poor whitey
  • airafromanairafroman Posts: 87
    edited January 2010
    Ounceman wrote: »
    Lmao. my sentiments exactly. i dont know if the author of this thread's intention was to be satirical or serious. if they were being satirical than i must admit i am laughing. but if they were being serious then im am still laughing. only this time the laughter is directly at the cracker than with them. because if anything interracial mixing promotes the downfall of white supremacy, not its progressiveness dumb bitch. commanding a snowbunny to sex a nigga will only produce black offspring further killing off the recessive cracker gene pool

    no look at the jews they have black blood in them,so do hispanics, and italians....the krackers r cunning all they will do is categorize these bi-racial babies...I'm like, u gorillas be beefing over light skin and darkskin...nigggaz are dumb as fuck,y'all coonz b lettin me down...what the article said about black men being head over heels over white women is true...niggaz be shytting on their own women yet constantly glorifyin' the white women here on the i.c.,how many so-called revolutionary done got themselves bi-racial kids....shyt blacks hate themselves All over the globe, they hate their "****** hair" muthafuckaz disliked the fact that Mike Jackson got himself a nose job but don't have a problem shytin on Hov's "niggger lips" R "niggger nose"....and what race shyt the hardest on dark skin ppl ? u know tha answer black ppl...." o nigga u black as fuck"... i neva heard a white person tell an extremly pale whitey, that he/she "is white as fuck"....not to mention the interaction beetween black men & black women....black women get on black men 4 not being "thug" enough and being to "nice" yet when they date crackers them white boys they be with at times be more effeminate than them....in conclusion this article is not 2 b taking lightly....if u look closely at what's left of the black community,shyt is being attack from all angles,black families are becoming myths....homosexuality amongst both men & women is prevalent....a lot of males locked up hugging up on a anotha nigga...no daddies...teenage pregnancy= babies taking care of babies...gangs...self hate issue...and most importantly you coons are unaware of what's happening....it seems that our community was waaaaaaaaay betta during segregation.... lately the media been promoting inter-racial dating beetween whites & blacks alot lately.... also we got a bi-racial president.... riley and that otha nigga been talking light skin dark skin lately....i'm just saying the krackers in charge realize their time is up...blacks in due time will regain their power....so to remain in control they will shift their power over to bi-racial kids....this article is a bit off white women ain't got shyt on black women...no ass,no curves, no lips,no umph...
  • shootemwonshootemwon Posts: 4,635 ✭✭
    edited February 2010
    I gotta say yes. I mean, however you wanna pretty it up with nice rhetoric, libertarianism ultimately comes back to property rights. As in the rights of SLAVE OWNERS to keep their PROPERTY AKA SLAVES.

    So black libertarians can argue about this that and the other and say welfare has kept the black man down, but the truth is you're supporting an ideology that, had it prevailed back in the day, would mean you'd be a slave.
  • bornnraisedoffCMRbornnraisedoffCMR Posts: 1,073 ✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Libertarians advovate property rights, and NATURAL HUMAN RIGHTS LIKE FREEDOM LIFE AND LIBERTY i.e. NOT SLAVERY!!


    You might need to go educate yourself youngsta.
  • DarcSkies777DarcSkies777 Posts: 5,603 ✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    That's only if you consider blacks as property

    Man WTF are you talking about? Also, there is what you believe in a vacuum and what you believe in the context of reality.

    For example I am against welfare and believe that people should start their own businesses and/or simply educate themselves and find work so that tax payers dont have to help them in the first place. But is that realistic for most minorities in the context of reality? NO.

    Believing something in theory and actually applying it to real life is two different things. But your slavery example is out of left field. I dont think you really know what you're talking about. And if you do please elaborate further.
  • obnoxiouslyfreshobnoxiouslyfresh ***Ms AllHipHop 2014*** Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Deja Vu?

    Is this a fuckin thread from like 6 years ago? Why do i remember this shit?
  • BOSS KTULUBOSS KTULU Posts: 978
    edited February 2010
    Libertarianism doesn't immediately allow slavery. But it would cause an impotent government to be powerless to stop corporations from subjecting laborers to slavery-like conditions.

    Wanna sue for a better work environment? Too bad, gubment's too small to oppose the company.

    Wanna unionize to guarantee a living wage? Too bad, the gubment can't save you from the company's private mercenaries.

    Wanna start a small business and compete in the big gay free market? Too bad, the company that manufactures the stuff you want to start making is conglomerated with every bank in town in a huge monopoly that can't be broken up because libertarians burned the gubment down.
  • bornnraisedoffCMRbornnraisedoffCMR Posts: 1,073 ✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Your body and your labor is you property so for someone else to claim it without offering you value in exchange for your labor goes against every libertarian principle.
  • DarcSkies777DarcSkies777 Posts: 5,603 ✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Your body and your labor is you property so for someone else to claim it without offering you value in exchange for your labor goes against every libertarian principle.

    ^^^ What he said
  • BOSS KTULUBOSS KTULU Posts: 978
    edited February 2010
    your labor is your property

    This is Marxism, not free market jibber jabber.
  • Fazeem_Blackall Fazeem_Blackall Posts: 4,216 ✭✭
    edited February 2010
    wow some people are so clueless it is pitifull, Why do kats always jump on that bandwagon hate without having a clue what the truth is. The MoFo we are posting on the internet look some shit up before making an ass of yourself...
  • shootemwonshootemwon Posts: 4,635 ✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Libertarians advovate property rights, and NATURAL HUMAN RIGHTS LIKE FREEDOM LIFE AND LIBERTY i.e. NOT SLAVERY!!


    You might need to go educate yourself youngsta.

    shut up uncle tom

    like i said, pretty it up with nice rhetoric. life liberty, etc aint meant shit about ending slavery to the founding fathers who modern libertarians still drool over. its all about property rights, and even if they dont believe slavery is ok stupid american libertarians would call it a state issue and well, good thing the LIBERTARIANS were on the losing side of the civil war
  • The_AfricanThe_African Posts: 174
    edited February 2010
    Libertarianism is based on the principle that aggressive violence is wrong. All authority is sustained through violence or the threat of violence and this is morally wrong. Without the power to impose violence on others, governments lose their authority.

    I don't understand libertarians who advocate 'small government', as though putting a gun to someone's head and forcing them to pay taxes to support a military and police force is more just than doing the same for money that would house and feed the poor. Anarchism is the consistent conclusion to libertarianism.
  • shootemwonshootemwon Posts: 4,635 ✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Libertarianism is based on the principle that aggressive violence is wrong. All authority is sustained through violence or the threat of violence and this is morally wrong. Without the power to impose violence on others, governments lose their authority.

    I don't understand libertarians who advocate 'small government', as though putting a gun to someone's head and forcing them to pay taxes to support a military and police force is more just than doing the same for money that would house and feed the poor. Anarchism is the consistent conclusion to libertarianism.

    Libertarianism is generally anarchy with the single exception being a publicly subsidized security force to protect rich people from poor people.
  • BOSS KTULUBOSS KTULU Posts: 978
    edited February 2010
    if somebody's not actively and consciously racist, they're not racist at all

    you mad?
  • Swiffness!Swiffness! Posts: 7,415 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    We will soon enslave your kind, paleface.
  • playmaker88playmaker88 You over did it holmes, you in the danger zone, you shouldn't be alone Posts: 49,901 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    Wont even entertain this.. Post count up by 1
  • Swiffness!Swiffness! Posts: 7,415 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    I predict Ktulu will get his L. Ron Hubbard on and found a white offshoot of the Nation of Gods and Earths.
  • BOSS KTULUBOSS KTULU Posts: 978
    edited February 2010
    I knew nobody would actually be able to respond. "Institutionalized racism" was made up by black intellectuals so they could continue to blame everything on whitey long after it was appropriate.
  • c_gutta1c_gutta1 Posts: 87
    edited February 2010
    BOSS KTULU wrote: »
    I knew nobody would actually be able to respond. "Institutionalized racism" was made up by black intellectuals so they could continue to blame everything on whitey long after it was appropriate.

    So if whitey shouldn't be blamed for everything, wat should they be blamed for and how long is the appropriate amount of time?
  • perspective@100perspective@100 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    BOSS KTULU wrote: »
    I knew nobody would actually be able to respond. "Institutionalized racism" was made up by black intellectuals so they could continue to blame everything on whitey long after it was appropriate.


    LOL, I really thought you brought this up to defend all the WHITE people who been making racist comments in the media and then being forgiven like " oh, he is just culturally insensitive. Its not his fault because he is a product of institutional racism"

    IRONIC
  • BOSS KTULUBOSS KTULU Posts: 978
    edited February 2010
    c_gutta1 wrote: »
    So if whitey shouldn't be blamed for everything, wat should they be blamed for and how long is the appropriate amount of time?

    howabout putting responsibility on individuals for their actions instead of assuming each person is helpless against the tide of history

    no we cant do that because then we cant make a living off liberal white guilt and black pseudo-intellectual college students
  • alissowackalissowack Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    But we can't deny that racism does exist even if we have some Blacks using it as an excuse to their own faults.
  • DarcSkies777DarcSkies777 Posts: 5,603 ✭✭✭
    edited February 2010
    24q7ja1.gif
    ..................
Sign In or Register to comment.