Trayvon Martin Case.... the plot thickens

Black_Samson · March 2012

smh

-Vincenzo- · March 2012

apocalyptica wrote: »

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?

Black_Samson · March 2012

ok. lets be real here.
do ya'll know how easy it is to break the skin on the back of the head?
do you all understand that the head is covered in tiny ass veins that bleed profusely when broken?

fiat_money · March 2012

-Vincenzo- wrote: »

http://nancygrace.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/funeral-director-saw-no-signs-of-fight-on-trayvons-hands/?hpt=ng_mid
Funeral director saw no signs of fight on Trayvon’s hands

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon Martin’s body for burial told HLN’s Nancy Grace Wednesday that he did not see any cuts or bruises on the teen’s hands that would have been indicative of a struggle with George Zimmerman.

Richard Kurtz of Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home in Fort Lauderdale said there appeared to be a gunshot wound in Martin’s upper chest area, but he received the body after the autopsy was completed so it was difficult to tell whether he had other injuries. He also could not determine the bullet’s entry or exit point.

“As for his hands and knuckles, I didn’t see any evidence he had been fighting anybody,” Kurtz said.

Citing police sources, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman told investigators Martin punched him and slammed his head into the ground repeatedly before he fired the shot that killed the unarmed 17-year-old. He claimed he shot Martin in self-defense, and he has not been charged in the case at this point.

While Kurtz is not a forensics expert, the funeral director said he has handled the bodies of many homicide victims in his career. This case in particular affected him as he learned more about what happened to Trayvon Martin and how the case was handled.

“I think the police investigation was the most unprofessional one I've ever seen in my lifetime,” Kurtz said.

For the latest on the Trayvon Martin case, watch "Nancy Grace" Wednesday at 8 pm and 10 p.m. ET on HLN.

It'd have to be assumed that his hands should have bruising/cuts for this to be significant.

-Vincenzo- wrote: »

apocalyptica wrote: »

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?

Were there reports that there was blood on his clothes?

Law Trafalgar · March 2012

fiat_money wrote: »

-Vincenzo- wrote: »

http://nancygrace.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/funeral-director-saw-no-signs-of-fight-on-trayvons-hands/?hpt=ng_mid
Funeral director saw no signs of fight on Trayvon’s hands

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon Martin’s body for burial told HLN’s Nancy Grace Wednesday that he did not see any cuts or bruises on the teen’s hands that would have been indicative of a struggle with George Zimmerman.

Richard Kurtz of Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home in Fort Lauderdale said there appeared to be a gunshot wound in Martin’s upper chest area, but he received the body after the autopsy was completed so it was difficult to tell whether he had other injuries. He also could not determine the bullet’s entry or exit point.

“As for his hands and knuckles, I didn’t see any evidence he had been fighting anybody,” Kurtz said.

Citing police sources, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman told investigators Martin punched him and slammed his head into the ground repeatedly before he fired the shot that killed the unarmed 17-year-old. He claimed he shot Martin in self-defense, and he has not been charged in the case at this point.

While Kurtz is not a forensics expert, the funeral director said he has handled the bodies of many homicide victims in his career. This case in particular affected him as he learned more about what happened to Trayvon Martin and how the case was handled.

“I think the police investigation was the most unprofessional one I've ever seen in my lifetime,” Kurtz said.

For the latest on the Trayvon Martin case, watch "Nancy Grace" Wednesday at 8 pm and 10 p.m. ET on HLN.

It'd have to be assumed that his hands should have bruising/cuts for this to be significant.

-Vincenzo- wrote: »

apocalyptica wrote: »

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?

Were there reports that there was blood on his clothes?

How do you shoot someone on top of you and not get blood on your clothes?

fiat_money · March 2012

SuperstarCole wrote: »

fiat_money wrote: »

-Vincenzo- wrote: »

http://nancygrace.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/28/funeral-director-saw-no-signs-of-fight-on-trayvons-hands/?hpt=ng_mid
Funeral director saw no signs of fight on Trayvon’s hands

The funeral director who prepared Trayvon Martin’s body for burial told HLN’s Nancy Grace Wednesday that he did not see any cuts or bruises on the teen’s hands that would have been indicative of a struggle with George Zimmerman.

Richard Kurtz of Roy Mizell and Kurtz Funeral Home in Fort Lauderdale said there appeared to be a gunshot wound in Martin’s upper chest area, but he received the body after the autopsy was completed so it was difficult to tell whether he had other injuries. He also could not determine the bullet’s entry or exit point.

“As for his hands and knuckles, I didn’t see any evidence he had been fighting anybody,” Kurtz said.

Citing police sources, the Orlando Sentinel reported that Zimmerman told investigators Martin punched him and slammed his head into the ground repeatedly before he fired the shot that killed the unarmed 17-year-old. He claimed he shot Martin in self-defense, and he has not been charged in the case at this point.

While Kurtz is not a forensics expert, the funeral director said he has handled the bodies of many homicide victims in his career. This case in particular affected him as he learned more about what happened to Trayvon Martin and how the case was handled.

“I think the police investigation was the most unprofessional one I've ever seen in my lifetime,” Kurtz said.

For the latest on the Trayvon Martin case, watch "Nancy Grace" Wednesday at 8 pm and 10 p.m. ET on HLN.

It'd have to be assumed that his hands should have bruising/cuts for this to be significant.

-Vincenzo- wrote: »

apocalyptica wrote: »

c'mon man...that shit is really gettin ridiculous

btw where is the blood on his clothes?

Were there reports that there was blood on his clothes?

How do you shoot someone on top of you and not get blood on your clothes?

fiat_money wrote: »

A contact shot through thick cloth (hoodie) doesn't necessarily mean there will be noticeable blood on the shooter, especially if Treyvon rolled off of Zimmerman after being shot.

bow to royalty · March 2012

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

ol_buddy · March 2012

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

redhandedbandit · March 2012

my question is orginally they were fighting in the grass now its the concrete

Sneak Dissa · March 2012

bow to royalty wrote: »

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy wrote: »

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-martin-case-exclusive-surveillance-video-george-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA

Law Trafalgar · March 2012

Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?

fiat_money · March 2012

Bando Calrissian wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy wrote: »

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-martin-case-exclusive-surveillance-video-george-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA

Alright this seems to show a bit more:

apocalyptica · March 2012

Law Trafalgar · March 2012

fiat_money wrote: »

Bando Calrissian wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy wrote: »

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-martin-case-exclusive-surveillance-video-george-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA

Alright this seems to show a bit more:

Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.

fiat_money · March 2012

SuperstarCole wrote: »

Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?

What was the source of this claim?

SuperstarCole wrote: »

fiat_money wrote: »

Bando Calrissian wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy wrote: »

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-martin-case-exclusive-surveillance-video-george-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA

Alright this seems to show a bit more:

Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.

I wouldn't think that the video is clear enough to determine the age of the wound.

All I can tell is that there appear to be multiple reddish abrasions.

Law Trafalgar · March 2012

fiat_money wrote: »

SuperstarCole wrote: »

Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?

What was the source of this claim?

SuperstarCole wrote: »

fiat_money wrote: »

Bando Calrissian wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy wrote: »

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-martin-case-exclusive-surveillance-video-george-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA

Alright this seems to show a bit more:

Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.

I wouldn't think that the video is clear enough to determine the age of the wound.

All I can tell is that there appear to be multiple reddish abrasions.

Shit, every officer with low cut hair in that vid looks to have reddish abrasions.

Trillaaaaaa · March 2012

apocalyptica wrote: »

This is pretty creative but I still flagged your post

lighthearted26 · March 2012

Im not even worried about this video and I only care to know if he has wounds to prove his people are liars, because him having wounds doesn't mean a killing is justified. The broken nose/head wound situation should come out when the pictures that police are supposed to take come out, if they even exist.

fiat_money · March 2012

If you say so.

SuperstarCole wrote: »

fiat_money wrote: »

SuperstarCole wrote: »

Wait a minute, i thought four hours passed before he got to the station. Now it's just 30 minutes?

What was the source of this claim?

SuperstarCole wrote: »

fiat_money wrote: »

Bando Calrissian wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

Never posted in GnS before but seein how people felt about this case. I feel like a lotta black people (I'm black) are handlin this all wrong. BET is doing something on it right now, and the way it's being handled is annoying

care to elaborate?

ol_buddy wrote: »

Why do surveillance cameras still have such low quality

they usually don't. that video isn't from a bad source it's just bad compression. the quality isn't even that bad to me but people will nitpick just to be contrary.

either way they were taking him to the interrogation room which will have had a clear video on him so when he does get charged the lawyers and jury will get to see that this dude barely had a scratch on him.

also - even though this is the same link i posted before they changed the video and enhanced it somewhat: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/trayvon-martin-case-exclusive-surveillance-video-george-zimmerman/story?id=16022897#.T3OoKTGPVYA

Alright this seems to show a bit more:

Looks like an old scar at best or thinning hair, not a gash that was just treated 30 minutes ago.

I wouldn't think that the video is clear enough to determine the age of the wound.

All I can tell is that there appear to be multiple reddish abrasions.

Shit, every officer with low cut hair in that vid looks to have reddish abrasions.

Must be a rough city yo.

bull6599 · March 2012

apocalyptica wrote: »

I.E. I really ain't got shit to say in light of new developments

on1x · March 2012

wait, there are people on this forum actually questioning whether this guy murdered this child? what the fuck?? get the FUCK out of here with that bullshit. it certainly doesn't take someone of even moderate intelligence to see that this man:

- profiled the youth because he was black

- stalked the youth

- confronted the youth

- shot him dead

that's all that needs to be highlighted. he committed murder. it's corny to even entertain a discussion with some white boy or self-hating uncle tom that exhibits any apologetic sentiment on behalf of zimmerman.

riddlerap · March 2012

yeah, make sure you dont take into account any facts or details. good call.

kingblaze84 · March 2012

on1x wrote: »

wait, there are people on this forum actually questioning whether this guy murdered this child? what the fuck?? get the FUCK out of here with that bullshit. it certainly doesn't take someone of even moderate intelligence to see that this man:

- profiled the youth because he was black

- stalked the youth

- confronted the youth

- shot him dead

that's all that needs to be highlighted. he committed murder. it's corny to even entertain a discussion with some white boy or self-hating uncle tom that exhibits any apologetic sentiment on behalf of zimmerman.

co sign all the way

Max. · March 2012

I hate when people say they dont care if trayvon was black..yet they cared a white/hispanic was the shooter..u know how many people get shot n killed everyday? Random good people that die over gang shit...media jus blew it up..just like how kony got its 15 mins of fame nobody cares about that shit anymore...

pralims · March 2012

i just cant see how a black man...can even defend this..
if you say your for right or wrong...they way things are handled is wrong...
the way you follow another person and claim self defense when they turn to protect themselves is wrong

i dont see how this is even a debate? what if this was your uncle or father on the way to the store to buy your ass some candy...how would you feel? would you defend it then?

AllHipHop.com

Forums

Trayvon Martin Case.... the plot thickens

Replies