› › ›

Wouldn't it be nice is there really was a God?

1235»

Replies

  • Oceanic Oceanic Posts: 5,216
    alissowack wrote: »
    BlackxChild wrote: »
    Allissowack your so fuckin lame... Why should I believe in something when there's no proof... Should I be as ignorant as you and just say I have faith/hope just because someone else says so? Do you know how to think for yourself. Im not saying there's no god but there probably isnt.

    Peep my signature, Black.

    @ BlackxChild ... In other words, he's a troll
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Rock WellRock Well Posts: 1,540
    lol Jaded my man im short on time these days. That other thread is a dead hustle. I thought I answered your question already anyway. The bottom line is the origin of man cannot be explained through evolite perspective. Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory. But yall can believe whatever theFACK u wanna believe like Hodge twins.
    Oceanic
    Flag • 1Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Rock WellRock Well Posts: 1,540
    It may not be comparable in every aspect, but unless you just being stupid you can see that God has left similar evidences like that of His existence. Not that you can detect Him on your own, bruh. That you might believe in His son and that He exist.
    God character is righteous and comparable to none else.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • alissowackalissowack Posts: 1,568
    Jaded Righteousness wrote: »
    ^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.

    The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.

    ...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • alissowackalissowack Posts: 1,568
    alissowack wrote: »
    Jaded Righteousness wrote: »
    ^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.

    The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.

    ...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.

    Somewhere I went wrong and quoted myself. Is it possible to erase this?
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Oceanic Oceanic Posts: 5,216
    solid analysis wrote: »
    Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory.


    link? source? something?

    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • ChromaStonedChromaStoned Posts: 938
    would it really though? maybe it would want to play god
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • redhandedbanditredhandedbandit Posts: 2,525
    is there was really god?
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
Sign In or Register to comment.