Wouldn't it be nice is there really was a God?

1235»

Replies

  • Rock_WellRock_Well Posts: 2,187 ✭✭✭✭✭
    lol Jaded my man im short on time these days. That other thread is a dead hustle. I thought I answered your question already anyway. The bottom line is the origin of man cannot be explained through evolite perspective. Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory. But yall can believe whatever theFACK u wanna believe like Hodge twins.
    Bodhi
  • Rock_WellRock_Well Posts: 2,187 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It may not be comparable in every aspect, but unless you just being stupid you can see that God has left similar evidences like that of His existence. Not that you can detect Him on your own, bruh. That you might believe in His son and that He exist.
    God character is righteous and comparable to none else.
  • alissowackalissowack Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭
    edited May 2012
    ^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.

    The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.

    ...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.
  • alissowackalissowack Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭
    edited May 2012
    alissowack wrote: »
    ^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.

    The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.

    ...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.

    Somewhere I went wrong and quoted myself. Is it possible to erase this?
  • BodhiBodhi Posts: 7,637 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory.


    link? source? something?

  • ChromaStonedChromaStoned Posts: 938 ✭✭✭
    would it really though? maybe it would want to play god
  • redhandedbanditredhandedbandit Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭
    is there was really god?
1235»
Sign In or Register to comment.