› ›

Trayvon had drugs in his system and all injuries show signs of a struggle.

1…5791011

Replies

  • cobblandcobbland Posts: 2,945
    No matter what the laws may state, we know from historical and current examples, that they aren't applied equally.

    Listing that he had weed in his system does nothing but vilify a young man and make his death seem justified. It serves no other purpose.

    Oddly enough, a large number of players drafted into the NFL last month had positive marijuana tests, but those niggers will be entertaining the masses, so all is forgiven as the fans cheer them on.

    I still feel for Trayvon's family.

    They would have been better off taking justice into their own hands.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Hyde ParkeHyde Parke Posts: 2,463
    cant quote for whatever reason but anyway

    @VIBE

    how do you know Zimmerman didn't confront Trayvon? what are you basing that on? Zimmermans own statement? He says he lost him, a clear indication that he was pursuing him. Now why would someone being chased, armed only with skittles and a can of tea, turn around and then become the chaser? That sound like some movie type shit.

    Who said his statements gave him a "killer state of mind"? reread my post, I said by his statements, one could reasonably conclude he was looking for a confrontation, which clearly one occurred as a result of Zimmerman's initial actions
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • CopperKingCopperKing Posts: 21,624
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    how did the fight start after zimmerman approached him is the only question that matters...who won the fight, who was smoking weed is irrelevant
    Not quite. Even if Zimmerman started the fight, that alone wouldn't make his use of force unlawful.

    it would be pretty hard to claim self-defense in a fight that you instigated
    Not if the conditions satisfy the following:
    776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
    (1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
    (2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
    (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
    (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
    History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.

    does any evidence exist that proves/supports that excessive force was reasonable or that zimmerman backed away from physical contact? because there is proof that he pursued wich led up to said incident. and would trayvon defense be able to claim defense (a) seeing as how he was the one approached?
    If the witness accounts that Zimmerman was on the ground screaming for help while getting his ass beat by Treyvon are true, and if Zimmerman was the aggressor; that may satisfy the below requirement for lawful use of force by the aggressor:
    the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant

    And it's not publicly known who confronted who yet. However, had Treyvon been able to kill Zimmerman instead, he could also claim self-defense.

    a few witnessess are claiming a few diff. things but yeah u right trayvon should have been able to claim self-defense but we all know how that would have turned out...but its all speculation about what went down
    Examples of the bolded?

    the news breh...the blond chick that said she saw and heard trayvon screaming for help as well as her roomate and the lil dude walking his dog..there conflicting stories is what im getting at
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • rakim iirakim ii Posts: 1,703
    A young nigga walking around with a bag of skittles and a arizona soft drink in hand is not looking to pick a fight. Use common sense dummies.
    ghost thoHyde Parkebootsy_jenkinsidoitforhiphop10
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign 3Cosign 1Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fiat_moneyfiat_money Posts: 16,671
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    how did the fight start after zimmerman approached him is the only question that matters...who won the fight, who was smoking weed is irrelevant
    Not quite. Even if Zimmerman started the fight, that alone wouldn't make his use of force unlawful.

    it would be pretty hard to claim self-defense in a fight that you instigated
    Not if the conditions satisfy the following:
    776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
    (1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
    (2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
    (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
    (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
    History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.

    does any evidence exist that proves/supports that excessive force was reasonable or that zimmerman backed away from physical contact? because there is proof that he pursued wich led up to said incident. and would trayvon defense be able to claim defense (a) seeing as how he was the one approached?
    If the witness accounts that Zimmerman was on the ground screaming for help while getting his ass beat by Treyvon are true, and if Zimmerman was the aggressor; that may satisfy the below requirement for lawful use of force by the aggressor:
    the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant

    And it's not publicly known who confronted who yet. However, had Treyvon been able to kill Zimmerman instead, he could also claim self-defense.

    a few witnessess are claiming a few diff. things but yeah u right trayvon should have been able to claim self-defense but we all know how that would have turned out...but its all speculation about what went down
    Examples of the bolded?

    the news breh...the blond chick that said she saw and heard trayvon screaming for help as well as her roomate and the lil dude walking his dog..there conflicting stories is what im getting at
    Those two women were only "ear-witnesses" to the fight; by their own account, they didn't see Zimmerman and Treyvon till after the gunshot.

    Mary Cutcher wouldn't have to speculate about who was screaming if she was an eyewitness to it:
    “It sounded young. It didn’t sound like a grown man is my point. It sounded to me like someone was in distress and it wasn’t like a crying, sobbing boo-hoo, it was a definite whine."

    And Austin Brown, who was the eyewitness walking the dog, says he saw a guy in a red shirt on the ground:



    So there is no conflict in what was witnessed there.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • VIBEVIBE Posts: 23,094
    Hyde Parke wrote: »
    cant quote for whatever reason but anyway

    @VIBE

    how do you know Zimmerman didn't confront Trayvon? what are you basing that on? Zimmermans own statement? He says he lost him, a clear indication that he was pursuing him. Now why would someone being chased, armed only with skittles and a can of tea, turn around and then become the chaser? That sound like some movie type shit.

    Who said his statements gave him a "killer state of mind"? reread my post, I said by his statements, one could reasonably conclude he was looking for a confrontation, which clearly one occurred as a result of Zimmerman's initial actions

    They obviously ran into each other by accident, who confronted who?

    He needed to find out why TM was there, this is because there was break-ins of late @ the time.

    Does TM have wounds besides the gun shot?
    ghost thoidoitforhiphop10stringer bell
    Flag • 3Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fuc_i_look_likefuc_i_look_like Posts: 5,621
    WTF @ this white dude on HLN news talmbout "Treyvon was found with a cigarette lighter and $40 in his wallet. He didn't have a job, so where'd he get this cash from"?

    That's some fucked up shit. A black male isn't allowed to have $40 on him w/o it being stolen/drug money?? That's a disgusting racist ass insinuation.

    idoitforhiphop10ROZAYTABERNACLE
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign 2Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fiat_moneyfiat_money Posts: 16,671
    Damn, I just noticed Treyvon's girlfriend's twitter account is down.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Hyde ParkeHyde Parke Posts: 2,463
    @ VIBE

    How do you know they "obviously" ran into each other by accident?
    He didn't need to find out why Trayvon was there, he wasn't commiting any crime at the time.
    A gunshot wound is wound enough.

    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • CopperKingCopperKing Posts: 21,624
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    how did the fight start after zimmerman approached him is the only question that matters...who won the fight, who was smoking weed is irrelevant
    Not quite. Even if Zimmerman started the fight, that alone wouldn't make his use of force unlawful.

    it would be pretty hard to claim self-defense in a fight that you instigated
    Not if the conditions satisfy the following:
    776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
    (1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
    (2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
    (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
    (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
    History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.

    does any evidence exist that proves/supports that excessive force was reasonable or that zimmerman backed away from physical contact? because there is proof that he pursued wich led up to said incident. and would trayvon defense be able to claim defense (a) seeing as how he was the one approached?
    If the witness accounts that Zimmerman was on the ground screaming for help while getting his ass beat by Treyvon are true, and if Zimmerman was the aggressor; that may satisfy the below requirement for lawful use of force by the aggressor:
    the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant

    And it's not publicly known who confronted who yet. However, had Treyvon been able to kill Zimmerman instead, he could also claim self-defense.

    a few witnessess are claiming a few diff. things but yeah u right trayvon should have been able to claim self-defense but we all know how that would have turned out...but its all speculation about what went down
    Examples of the bolded?

    the news breh...the blond chick that said she saw and heard trayvon screaming for help as well as her roomate and the lil dude walking his dog..there conflicting stories is what im getting at
    Those two women were only "ear-witnesses" to the fight; by their own account, they didn't see Zimmerman and Treyvon till after the gunshot.

    Mary Cutcher wouldn't have to speculate about who was screaming if she was an eyewitness to it:
    “It sounded young. It didn’t sound like a grown man is my point. It sounded to me like someone was in distress and it wasn’t like a crying, sobbing boo-hoo, it was a definite whine."

    And Austin Brown, who was the eyewitness walking the dog, says he saw a guy in a red shirt on the ground:



    So there is no conflict in what was witnessed there.

    http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-05-18/news/os-trayvon-martin-evidence-witness6-20120518_1_key-witness-ground-dog-fight
    another recent conflicting story about what happened that night
    http://www.standard.net/stories/2012/05/18/witnesses-tell-conflicting-stories-about-what-happened-trayvon-martin

    so u saying that the stories of several witnesses arent conflicting...I can find plenty more evidence
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fiat_moneyfiat_money Posts: 16,671
    ghost tho wrote: »
    ^ its bigot bait
    Word, if them racist crakkkaz find out his girlfriend was white, they'll probably get mad as fuck.

    hN2FU.jpg
    VIBEidoitforhiphop10ROZAYTABERNACLE#1 pick
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign 3Ether 1GOAT LOL •
  • CopperKingCopperKing Posts: 21,624
    who that fiat?
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Drgoo0285Drgoo0285 Posts: 483
    fiat_money wrote: »
    ghost tho wrote: »
    ^ its bigot bait
    Word, if them racist crakkkaz find out his girlfriend was white, they'll probably get mad as fuck.

    hN2FU.jpg
    Dayyynnnngggggg....

    No pedo
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • dalyricalbanditdalyricalbandit Posts: 39,478
    fiat_money wrote: »
    ghost tho wrote: »
    ^ its bigot bait
    Word, if them racist crakkkaz find out his girlfriend was white, they'll probably get mad as fuck.

    hN2FU.jpg

    well well who is this
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fiat_moneyfiat_money Posts: 16,671
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    how did the fight start after zimmerman approached him is the only question that matters...who won the fight, who was smoking weed is irrelevant
    Not quite. Even if Zimmerman started the fight, that alone wouldn't make his use of force unlawful.

    it would be pretty hard to claim self-defense in a fight that you instigated
    Not if the conditions satisfy the following:
    776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
    (1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
    (2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
    (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
    (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
    History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.

    does any evidence exist that proves/supports that excessive force was reasonable or that zimmerman backed away from physical contact? because there is proof that he pursued wich led up to said incident. and would trayvon defense be able to claim defense (a) seeing as how he was the one approached?
    If the witness accounts that Zimmerman was on the ground screaming for help while getting his ass beat by Treyvon are true, and if Zimmerman was the aggressor; that may satisfy the below requirement for lawful use of force by the aggressor:
    the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant

    And it's not publicly known who confronted who yet. However, had Treyvon been able to kill Zimmerman instead, he could also claim self-defense.

    a few witnessess are claiming a few diff. things but yeah u right trayvon should have been able to claim self-defense but we all know how that would have turned out...but its all speculation about what went down
    Examples of the bolded?

    the news breh...the blond chick that said she saw and heard trayvon screaming for help as well as her roomate and the lil dude walking his dog..there conflicting stories is what im getting at
    Those two women were only "ear-witnesses" to the fight; by their own account, they didn't see Zimmerman and Treyvon till after the gunshot.

    Mary Cutcher wouldn't have to speculate about who was screaming if she was an eyewitness to it:
    “It sounded young. It didn’t sound like a grown man is my point. It sounded to me like someone was in distress and it wasn’t like a crying, sobbing boo-hoo, it was a definite whine."

    And Austin Brown, who was the eyewitness walking the dog, says he saw a guy in a red shirt on the ground:



    So there is no conflict in what was witnessed there.

    http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-05-18/news/os-trayvon-martin-evidence-witness6-20120518_1_key-witness-ground-dog-fight
    another recent conflicting story about what happened that night
    http://www.standard.net/stories/2012/05/18/witnesses-tell-conflicting-stories-about-what-happened-trayvon-martin

    so u saying that the stories of several witnesses arent conflicting...I can find plenty more evidence
    A witness saying they "don't know" who was on top or who was screaming is not a conflict with another witness saying they do know.

    When I use "conflict", I'm referring to this definition:
    2: to be different, opposed, or contradictory : to fail to be in agreement or accord <his statement conflicts with the facts>

    If I say I ate a tuna sandwich 20 minutes ago, and someone else says I (referring to me, fiat_money) had a ham sandwich 20 minutes ago; that's a conflict in accounts. But if they instead say they don't know what I ate 20 minutes ago, there is no conflict in accounts.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • VIBEVIBE Posts: 23,094
    Hyde Parke wrote: »
    @ VIBE

    How do you know they "obviously" ran into each other by accident?
    He didn't need to find out why Trayvon was there, he wasn't commiting any crime at the time.
    A gunshot wound is wound enough.

    GZ lost TM, they both ended up running into each other.

    He didn't need to but he can if he wanted to, based on the recent break-ins he can do as he pleases. There shouldn't have been a fight or murder though, that I'm not condoning.

    People need to stop catching feelings and look at facts. (not @you Hyde, but @everyone who's mad @ who is "supporting" GZ)
    ghost tho
    Flag • 1Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fuc_i_look_likefuc_i_look_like Posts: 5,621
    U niggaz are so easily impressed. That white bitch is a butta face
    ghost thoScumbagSwagHyde Parkeidoitforhiphop10ROZAYTABERNACLE
    Flag • 1Wack Feelings Nosign 4Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Drgoo0285Drgoo0285 Posts: 483
    nothing like an attractive white female to stop a the rally of militant black men...

    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • CopperKingCopperKing Posts: 21,624
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    how did the fight start after zimmerman approached him is the only question that matters...who won the fight, who was smoking weed is irrelevant
    Not quite. Even if Zimmerman started the fight, that alone wouldn't make his use of force unlawful.

    it would be pretty hard to claim self-defense in a fight that you instigated
    Not if the conditions satisfy the following:
    776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
    (1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
    (2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
    (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
    (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
    History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.

    does any evidence exist that proves/supports that excessive force was reasonable or that zimmerman backed away from physical contact? because there is proof that he pursued wich led up to said incident. and would trayvon defense be able to claim defense (a) seeing as how he was the one approached?
    If the witness accounts that Zimmerman was on the ground screaming for help while getting his ass beat by Treyvon are true, and if Zimmerman was the aggressor; that may satisfy the below requirement for lawful use of force by the aggressor:
    the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant

    And it's not publicly known who confronted who yet. However, had Treyvon been able to kill Zimmerman instead, he could also claim self-defense.

    a few witnessess are claiming a few diff. things but yeah u right trayvon should have been able to claim self-defense but we all know how that would have turned out...but its all speculation about what went down
    Examples of the bolded?

    the news breh...the blond chick that said she saw and heard trayvon screaming for help as well as her roomate and the lil dude walking his dog..there conflicting stories is what im getting at
    Those two women were only "ear-witnesses" to the fight; by their own account, they didn't see Zimmerman and Treyvon till after the gunshot.

    Mary Cutcher wouldn't have to speculate about who was screaming if she was an eyewitness to it:
    “It sounded young. It didn’t sound like a grown man is my point. It sounded to me like someone was in distress and it wasn’t like a crying, sobbing boo-hoo, it was a definite whine."

    And Austin Brown, who was the eyewitness walking the dog, says he saw a guy in a red shirt on the ground:



    So there is no conflict in what was witnessed there.

    http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-05-18/news/os-trayvon-martin-evidence-witness6-20120518_1_key-witness-ground-dog-fight
    another recent conflicting story about what happened that night
    http://www.standard.net/stories/2012/05/18/witnesses-tell-conflicting-stories-about-what-happened-trayvon-martin

    so u saying that the stories of several witnesses arent conflicting...I can find plenty more evidence
    A witness saying they "don't know" who was on top or who was screaming is not a conflict with another witness saying they do know.

    When I use "conflict", I'm referring to this definition:
    2: to be different, opposed, or contradictory : to fail to be in agreement or accord <his statement conflicts with the facts>

    If I say I ate a tuna sandwich 20 minutes ago, and someone else says I (referring to me, fiat_money) had a ham sandwich 20 minutes ago; that's a conflict in accounts. But if they instead say they don't know what I ate 20 minutes ago, there is no conflict in accounts.

    it is a conflict if they stated something diff. in previous interviews/questioning

    and who is the chick?
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fuc_i_look_likefuc_i_look_like Posts: 5,621
    @drgoo0285
    I know right smh, shits low key pathetic
    High Revolutionaryidoitforhiphop10
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign 1Cosign 1Ether GOAT LOL •
  • In Your Moms RoomIn Your Moms Room Posts: 6,919
    Zimmerman gonna be convicted of man slaughter. Get a couple years.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • In Your Moms RoomIn Your Moms Room Posts: 6,919
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    copperkid27 wrote: »
    how did the fight start after zimmerman approached him is the only question that matters...who won the fight, who was smoking weed is irrelevant
    Not quite. Even if Zimmerman started the fight, that alone wouldn't make his use of force unlawful.

    it would be pretty hard to claim self-defense in a fight that you instigated
    Not if the conditions satisfy the following:
    776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
    (1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
    (2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
    (a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
    (b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
    History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1190, ch. 97-102.

    does any evidence exist that proves/supports that excessive force was reasonable or that zimmerman backed away from physical contact? because there is proof that he pursued wich led up to said incident. and would trayvon defense be able to claim defense (a) seeing as how he was the one approached?
    If the witness accounts that Zimmerman was on the ground screaming for help while getting his ass beat by Treyvon are true, and if Zimmerman was the aggressor; that may satisfy the below requirement for lawful use of force by the aggressor:
    the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant

    And it's not publicly known who confronted who yet. However, had Treyvon been able to kill Zimmerman instead, he could also claim self-defense.

    a few witnessess are claiming a few diff. things but yeah u right trayvon should have been able to claim self-defense but we all know how that would have turned out...but its all speculation about what went down
    Examples of the bolded?

    the news breh...the blond chick that said she saw and heard trayvon screaming for help as well as her roomate and the lil dude walking his dog..there conflicting stories is what im getting at
    Those two women were only "ear-witnesses" to the fight; by their own account, they didn't see Zimmerman and Treyvon till after the gunshot.

    Mary Cutcher wouldn't have to speculate about who was screaming if she was an eyewitness to it:
    “It sounded young. It didn’t sound like a grown man is my point. It sounded to me like someone was in distress and it wasn’t like a crying, sobbing boo-hoo, it was a definite whine."

    And Austin Brown, who was the eyewitness walking the dog, says he saw a guy in a red shirt on the ground:



    So there is no conflict in what was witnessed there.

    http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-05-18/news/os-trayvon-martin-evidence-witness6-20120518_1_key-witness-ground-dog-fight
    another recent conflicting story about what happened that night
    http://www.standard.net/stories/2012/05/18/witnesses-tell-conflicting-stories-about-what-happened-trayvon-martin

    so u saying that the stories of several witnesses arent conflicting...I can find plenty more evidence
    A witness saying they "don't know" who was on top or who was screaming is not a conflict with another witness saying they do know.

    When I use "conflict", I'm referring to this definition:
    2: to be different, opposed, or contradictory : to fail to be in agreement or accord <his statement conflicts with the facts>

    If I say I ate a tuna sandwich 20 minutes ago, and someone else says I (referring to me, fiat_money) had a ham sandwich 20 minutes ago; that's a conflict in accounts. But if they instead say they don't know what I ate 20 minutes ago, there is no conflict in accounts.

    it is a conflict if they stated something diff. in previous interviews/questioning

    and who is the chick?

    You sir, have the best sig on the I.C.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • CopperKingCopperKing Posts: 21,624
    Drgoo0285 wrote: »
    nothing like an attractive white female to stop a the rally of militant black men...

    lmao....
    but I'd leave a rally to fuck that
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • Hyde ParkeHyde Parke Posts: 2,463
    @vibe

    we don't know for certain they ended up running into each other. that's inconclusive.
    There is nothing wrong with noticing someone who your perceive to be suspicious and contacting the authorities, where it goes wrong is when u pursue the person, you are not the police, the person is not committing any crime, regardless if you fall back. The fact is Trayvon's death is a direct result of Zimmerman's action to shoot him. A jury will have to decide based on the evidence they have, if it was justifiable.

    people take issue with all this because they see the flaws and injustice in the system.
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •
  • fiat_moneyfiat_money Posts: 16,671
    dalyricalbandit wrote: »
    fiat_money wrote: »
    ghost tho wrote: »
    ^ its bigot bait
    Word, if them racist crakkkaz find out his girlfriend was white, they'll probably get mad as fuck.

    hN2FU.jpg

    well well who is this
    I think it's Treyvon's female friend:
    An6XG2sCAAEvtE_.jpg
    1175c0647b5f11e1a87612313804ec91_7.jpg
    4507c0287bb711e1b9f1123138140926_7.jpg
    VaqZX.jpg
    zNozR.jpg
    qDHtC.jpg
    mmVX5.jpg
    Mea0n.jpg
    ofYVX.jpg
    yQ1My.png
    ROZAYTABERNACLE
    Flag • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether 1GOAT LOL •
Sign In or Register to comment.