After paying at 7-11, Trayvon tries to shoplift some more candy, but the clerk sees him, so Trayvon walks to the back of the store and pretends to pick something up. Funny as hell. It's 0:30 to 0:53 in this video:
After paying at 7-11, Trayvon tries to shoplift some more candy, but the clerk sees him, so Trayvon walks to the back of the store and pretends to pick something up. Funny as hell. It's 0:30 to 0:53 in this video:
After paying at 7-11, Trayvon tries to shoplift some more candy, but the clerk sees him, so Trayvon walks to the back of the store and pretends to pick something up. Funny as hell. It's 0:30 to 0:53 in this video:
I ain't know they released the footage of Trayvon in the store before everything went down...He was a big kid...No wonder why he beat Zimmerman's bitch ass lol..
@fiat
they didn't say that, so this would just be your opinion. you could say that's just their opinion to, but seeing as they wrote the law, their opinion would hold more weight.
Zimmerman had the right to stand HIS ground, but Trevon was not allowed to stand his ground and defend himself? Even though Zimmerman approached and followed Trevon AFTER the police told him to stand by?
I understand it now. If you are Black, you can't defend yourself if you feel threatened.
Zimmerman had the right to stand HIS ground, but Trevon was not allowed to stand his ground and defend himself? Even though Zimmerman approached and followed Trevon AFTER the police told him to stand by?
I understand it now. If you are Black, you can't defend yourself if you feel threatened.
No one said that, TM did as he was allowed to and within that GM stood his. The courts will decide if GZ was right or not.
@fiat
they didn't say that, so this would just be your opinion. you could say that's just their opinion to, but seeing as they wrote the law, their opinion would hold more weight.
Basic reasoning, based on the actual law as it is written, taken directly from the Florida Senate's government website:
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.—A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.
History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1188, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2005-27.
Unless you can prove that Zimmerman could not "reasonably believe that such force was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself", then me saying the above law can apply here is correct.
If they say the law does not apply here, even though, as it is written above, the law can apply here; then there is a difference in the law as it is written and as they envision it.
If they wrote the law, and there was a difference in the law as it was written and as they envisioned it; then they mis-wrote it.
Either that, or they simply changed their minds after the fact.
Replies
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •Not sure about the second.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •well well had him a bunny i see.......can see where he got his smoking from
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- 3Troll
-6 • 3Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •when you have the author's of the stand your ground law sayin it doesn't apply to this case, that's a strong indication that something is wrong here
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
6 • Wack Feelings Nosign 1Cosign 5Ether GOAT LOL •i see you...troll.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
-2 • 3Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign 1Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
-5 • 5Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •they didn't say that, so this would just be your opinion. you could say that's just their opinion to, but seeing as they wrote the law, their opinion would hold more weight.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
2 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign 2Ether GOAT LOL •I understand it now. If you are Black, you can't defend yourself if you feel threatened.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
4 • Wack Feelings Nosign 4Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
2 • Wack Feelings Nosign 1Cosign 1Ether GOAT LOL •No one said that, TM did as he was allowed to and within that GM stood his. The courts will decide if GZ was right or not.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
-4 • 4Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •If they say the law does not apply here, even though, as it is written above, the law can apply here; then there is a difference in the law as it is written and as they envision it.
If they wrote the law, and there was a difference in the law as it was written and as they envisioned it; then they mis-wrote it.
Either that, or they simply changed their minds after the fact.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • 1Wack Feelings Nosign 1Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •Florida yes.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
-5 • 5Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •2. No
3. No
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
-5 • 5Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •Maybe some protests.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether GOAT LOL •I don't get where you get I want him to be innocent. I believe he won't be found guilty, but if he is then that's cool too.
So what do you think he said now? Coons or punks?
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
-1 • 2Wack Feelings Nosign Cosign Ether 1GOAT LOL •