The Official 2012 NFL Offseason Free Agency/Draft Thread

northside7 · June 2012

Matt- wrote: »

lol @ justin tuck's new facemask

Harder to grab his face mask..

Matt- · June 2012

obviously.

KINGOFDAARCADE · June 2012

that some Hannibal lector shit

TheBossman · June 2012

Matt- wrote: »

lol @ justin tuck's new facemask

shit looks like a hockey mask.

caddo man · June 2012

New Orleans Saints defensive end Greg Romeus tears ACL and MCL in his knee

Dude hasnt even played a down in the NFL yet. Hell he hasnt even put on pads yet. Both knees out for two seasons.

vageneral08 · June 2012

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

vageneral08 · June 2012

numbaz...80's baby wrote: »

Vick didnt play the whole season. They didnt even make the playoffs. Manning on there and aint even play. I thought that in order to be a top 100 player, you had to PLAY?

S/N: Saints' fans.........Yall goin sign ya QB netime soon? I think yall could use him.

That's why I said it's a joke

bow to royalty · June 2012

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

vageneral08 · June 2012

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

bow to royalty · June 2012

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

nujerz84 · June 2012

Romo Played better than Vick last season which what the list should be based on

tru_m.a.c · June 2012

Matt- wrote: »

lol @ justin tuck's new facemask

I see nothing but bad things in future from this mask

so is the designer honestly saying that there is no way a pinky can get snagged in that helmet???

I hope no offensive player gets that helmet, it can only work for a defensive guy

northside7 · June 2012

nujerz84 wrote: »

Romo Played better than Vick last season which what the list should be based on

The bold are the key words. Obviously their peers think differently.

KINGOFDAARCADE · June 2012

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

I agree they are both under ranked.

Since QB is easily the most important position, the Top 10 should be all QBs.

northside7 · June 2012

KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

I agree they are both under ranked.

Since QB is easily the most important position, the Top 10 should be all QBs.

Ha Who are these QBs?

vageneral08 · June 2012

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

that's just 4th quarter numbers bruh bring the whole stats for the season......vick didnt even play the whole season and the eagles still had a better to get into the playoffs than the cowboys......vick is more important to his team than romo is to the cowboys that's one of the reason's why he's ranked higher than romo

bow to royalty · June 2012

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

that's just 4th quarter numbers bruh bring the whole stats for the season......vick didnt even play the whole season and the eagles still had a better to get into the playoffs than the cowboys......vick is more important to his team than romo is to the cowboys that's one of the reason's why he's ranked higher than romo

Vick didn't play the whole season and they still almost made the playoffs, so Vick is more important to his team? Yaaaaa, that makes sense.

You said Romo lost games for the Cowboys and that's what counts. So I give you 4th quarter stats, and you can't see a connection? Vick disappeared on some Lebron shit in the 4th. 3 TD's all season? But people just blame the D when they lose a lead late in games. Ignoring the fact that Vick didn't put up points (Lebron status).

Season stats:
Romo 31 TD's 10 INT (3.1 TD/INT ratio)
Vick 18 TD's 14 INT ( 1.28 TD/INT ratio)

Romo 4,184 yards, 66.3% completion, 8 yards/attempt
Vick 3,303 yards, 59.8% completion, 7.8 yards/attempt

Romo led 4 game winning drives
Vick led 0

Your turn....

nujerz84 · June 2012

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

that's just 4th quarter numbers bruh bring the whole stats for the season......vick didnt even play the whole season and the eagles still had a better to get into the playoffs than the cowboys......vick is more important to his team than romo is to the cowboys that's one of the reason's why he's ranked higher than romo

Fail.... Had the Cowgirls defeated the Giants the last week they win the NFC East...

Matt- · June 2012

this is amazing news and it will probably revolutionalize how the game and players get talked about

Rejoice, football dorks! The NFL evidently rolled out its Game Rewind 2012 today and announced that there'll be real full-game-length All-22 film in there. This is big.

vageneral08 · June 2012

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

that's just 4th quarter numbers bruh bring the whole stats for the season......vick didnt even play the whole season and the eagles still had a better to get into the playoffs than the cowboys......vick is more important to his team than romo is to the cowboys that's one of the reason's why he's ranked higher than romo

Vick didn't play the whole season and they still almost made the playoffs, so Vick is more important to his team? Yaaaaa, that makes sense.

You said Romo lost games for the Cowboys and that's what counts. So I give you 4th quarter stats, and you can't see a connection? Vick disappeared on some Lebron shit in the 4th. 3 TD's all season? But people just blame the D when they lose a lead late in games. Ignoring the fact that Vick didn't put up points (Lebron status).

Season stats:
Romo 31 TD's 10 INT (3.1 TD/INT ratio)
Vick 18 TD's 14 INT ( 1.28 TD/INT ratio)

Romo 4,184 yards, 66.3% completion, 8 yards/attempt
Vick 3,303 yards, 59.8% completion, 7.8 yards/attempt

Romo led 4 game winning drives
Vick led 0

Your turn....

Yes he is vick is more important to his team than romo is.....it's has been shown....when vick was injuried vince young couldnt do shit....but when romo got hurt john kinta was playing better than romo that year alone......funny how people want to blame the defense when dallas loses a late lead game....ok so romo has had 4 winning game drives wonder how he got the ball in the first place?.....DEFENSE so if you want to give romo credit you have to give the defense credit for the win too....you cant blame the defense when your qb throws 2 pick 6's and one more int......why would the qb throw to one of the best corners in the league in the last min of the game? makes no sense at all.....

vageneral08 · June 2012

nujerz84 wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

that's just 4th quarter numbers bruh bring the whole stats for the season......vick didnt even play the whole season and the eagles still had a better to get into the playoffs than the cowboys......vick is more important to his team than romo is to the cowboys that's one of the reason's why he's ranked higher than romo

Fail.... Had the Cowgirls defeated the Giants the last week they win the NFC East...

No wrong they needed a lost from philly and a win themselves philly was #2 in the division and the cowboys was #3

TheBossman · June 2012

comes in to see ANOTHER vick vs romo debate. *waits for the subject to change*

vageneral08 · June 2012

The Bossman wrote: »

comes in to see ANOTHER vick vs romo debate. *waits for the subject to change*

Wasnt trying to go in that direction but ended up that way but oh well.....anybody got signed lately?

Shizlansky · June 2012

Just cuz
Romo > Vick

bow to royalty · June 2012

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

bow to royalty wrote: »

vageneral08 wrote: »

Yeah vick is ranked too low on that list but the whole list is a joke anyway

He's not ranked too low. If Tony Romo is 91, NO WAY Vick is too low at 70. Romo's the one who needs to be moved up.

lol what? no sir romo is good where he's at....he's overrated as it now

Definitely not. He had a better year than QB's ahead of him. He had a better year than Vick, Rivers, and Cam Newton. You can't give me any reason why Vick would be over Romo last year.

and how many games did he lose for the cowboys again? shit like that is what counts.....peyton didnt even play at all and he's at 50.......

The same amount he came back and won for the team. But no one remembers those because they just want to listen to what the media says.

In the 4th quarter Romo had 10 TD's 2 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 6 TD's 2 INT. 3 TD's 1 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 31 TD's 10 INT. Who else puts up numbers like that, and people think they shouldn't even be top 100?

In 4th quarter Vick had 3 TD's 3 INT. In the 4th with the score within 7, he had 1 TD 2 INT. 3 TD's 3 INT within the last 2 mins of the half/game. He had 18 TD's 14 INT.

ANYONE who thinks Vick had a better year than Romo is a stan or hater.

that's just 4th quarter numbers bruh bring the whole stats for the season......vick didnt even play the whole season and the eagles still had a better to get into the playoffs than the cowboys......vick is more important to his team than romo is to the cowboys that's one of the reason's why he's ranked higher than romo

Vick didn't play the whole season and they still almost made the playoffs, so Vick is more important to his team? Yaaaaa, that makes sense.

You said Romo lost games for the Cowboys and that's what counts. So I give you 4th quarter stats, and you can't see a connection? Vick disappeared on some Lebron shit in the 4th. 3 TD's all season? But people just blame the D when they lose a lead late in games. Ignoring the fact that Vick didn't put up points (Lebron status).

Season stats:
Romo 31 TD's 10 INT (3.1 TD/INT ratio)
Vick 18 TD's 14 INT ( 1.28 TD/INT ratio)

Romo 4,184 yards, 66.3% completion, 8 yards/attempt
Vick 3,303 yards, 59.8% completion, 7.8 yards/attempt

Romo led 4 game winning drives
Vick led 0

Your turn....

Yes he is vick is more important to his team than romo is.....it's has been shown....when vick was injuried vince young couldnt do shit....but when romo got hurt john kinta was playing better than romo that year alone......funny how people want to blame the defense when dallas loses a late lead game....ok so romo has had 4 winning game drives wonder how he got the ball in the first place?.....DEFENSE so if you want to give romo credit you have to give the defense credit for the win too....you cant blame the defense when your qb throws 2 pick 6's and one more int......why would the qb throw to one of the best corners in the league in the last min of the game? makes no sense at all.....

17 TD's 14 INT and you go 8-8. How important is he? And like I said, he fucked up in the 4th (and whole 2nd half). Kitna didn't do better than Romo. And get outta here with that blame the defense lie. People blame Romo EVERY chance they get. People blame the Eagles run D, and OL a lot though. I'm not sayin Romo doesn't fuck up, because he does. But he gets hated on more than he deserves because he's the Cowboys QB.

AllHipHop.com

Forums

The Official 2012 NFL Offseason Free Agency/Draft Thread

Replies