What's up everybody! Just a quick message. We will be relaunching with the goal of keeping the community front and center. I have worked with Jamal and select moderators, to make sure The Illl Community's needs are being addressed as we evolve. We are encouraging you to use the new platform.

We will NOT be closing the current community, but we will be porting user data over to the new system over time, so please get used to using the new community!

We will be working on it every single day until it's exactly what you want!

Please feel free to join now, test, as we are in beta:

fiat_money ✭✭✭✭✭


Last Active
  • Re: You ever see a chic with an ass so phat

    Imagining fucking them>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Imagining sniffing their ass
  • Re: Famales being popular on a messageboard leads to doing Porn

    haute wrote: »
    ...Those who know how to break bitch knows this
    8 Ball approves:

    It takes a nigga that's hard from the start, you gotta have heart;
    To meet a bitch, mack her down, then rip her apart.
    It's all in the game; a nigga can't change.
    If you don't break a bitch, then your game is lame mayne.
  • Re: Famales being popular on a messageboard leads to doing Porn

    _God_ wrote: »
    but now i herd shes doing full fledged porn
    Probably a natural progression for a camwhore.
  • Re: Ayo Du maybe I got this all wrong but

    This thread didn't turn out nearly as amusing as I thought.

  • Re: Is terrorism an effective way to advance one cause?

    janklow wrote: »
    what disapproves your point is acting like they're special... unless it's all about them being nuclear. what's the objectionable part of the bombings that makes them terrorism in your eyes?

    well, this is admittedly sort of subjective in that we don't know what's "more terrifying" to people out there, but i'm not convinced that the increased amount of planes involved somehow makes the bombings of Tokyo less terrifying.
    After the two bombings, which were both unexpected--due to the lack of any warning which was given to other Japanese cities before bombing them--and devastating, the president of the United States conveyed this message to Japan "If they do not now accept our terms, they may expect a rain of ruin from the air the likes of which has never been seen on this earth.". This was textbook terrorism (the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion).
    janklow wrote: »
    well, you did; this is the quote:
    "Not an extended series of coordinated strategic bombing efforts, as those would be more of a series of attacks rather than one large attack"
    the March raid on Tokyo was, in fact, one large attack. a battle that involves a pile of tanks isn't a series of tank fights, it's one large attack. and again, it's weird to claim any raid is part of "coordinated strategic bombing efforts" and the atomic bombings were not when they were ALL carried out by the same air forces from the same nation against the same target nation.
    The March 10th bombing raid was preceded by another raid just 6 days prior, and was one of several bombing raids on Tokyo over an extended period of time (around 6 months). Hence the wording, "an extended series of coordinated strategic bombing efforts".