Almost every big corporation in America was started by somebody who grew up in extreme poverty. The two richest Americans ever, Rockefeller and Carnegie, were so poor they had to get full time jobs before they reached puberty to provide money to their parents to help them maintain their households.
The whole distribution of wealth concept is complete nonsense, because all of the money in America is not gathered in one place and distributed to people. The difference between wealthy people and poor people is in how they earn their income.
Wealthy people work to build passive income. Passive Income = Money that comes whether you work or not.
Poor people work for paychecks. Paychecks = Money that comes and goes.
Any person that does something that will earn them an income whether they work or not and continues to build on it will become wealthy.
Umm, it's the continuing to build on it that's the problem. If the money you're making just manages to cover your expenses, you're not going have much to build with and you're not going to have anything to invest and earn passive income. It takes money to make mone.
marriage and civil union is the same, lol.....boy I tell ya,
Dont follow the way of the heathen my elohim said, that's what set apart means.
Now they use animals, muthafuckas now have no problem of beastality either I guess, hey it's natural animals do it.
Really animals, animals also lick their asses
Humans lick asses too, you ever watch a porno movie? Human beings are animals as well anyway, we're no better or different.
that's all you can come up with, I am going to fuck with you (no greek) though since you like to play and
1) Animals lick their asses to clean themselves you dumbass, humans don't.
2) People in porno lick other people asses because they choose to, they don't lick their asses to clean themselves, again they choose to, just like gays choose to be Gay
3) You make your western civilization teacher proud, humans are animals that's the same shit the devil tells people to lick asses......
Listen you fucking idiot, if you don't think humans are animals then I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have no concept of biology and you are dumb enough to believe humans are not a member of the primate species, most scientists would laugh at you if you tell them humans are not a form of animal. We share most of our DNA with other mammals, including mice. Believe what you wana believe, if you wana believe humans are not a form of animal then knock yourself out. You probably believe the world was created in 7 days too right?
Mice and men share about 97.5 per cent of their working DNA, just one per cent less than chimps and humans. The new estimate is based on the comparison of mouse chromosome 16 with human DNA. Previous estimates had suggested mouse-human differences as high as 15 per cent.
The new work suggests that neither genome has changed much since we shared a common ancestor 100 million years ago. "The differences are going to be few rather than many," says Richard Mural of Celera Genomics, the Maryland company that compared the mouse chromosome with human DNA.
--Go read some science books sometime, hopefully your small brain will be able to comprehend it.
most scientist will laugh at me, TMH will laugh at the scientist...
oh there it is, the 7 day theory, that's the little safety exit they always pull, nigga shut yo ass up right now, ya here!!!
You couldn't even understand what one day to the Most High, we dealing with his time no man.....
The purpose of sex is to reproduce................
I could care less if gay mariage gets approved or not (doesn't affect me one way or the other) but this post had me laughing.....
The ONLY purpose of sex is to reproduce?? If that's the case how come some people can't have kids when they fuck? Animals and humans are known to have sex just to have fun and build stronger community ties. Not sure where you're getting your info from but it's wrong.
you need to get in the school of the ancestors, there is a cause and effect.....why some people cant have kids because of laws broken that's why, either they, grandparents or great grandparents ect.....broke some type of dietary law that have effect on them or their future generations
Right now, I'm not concerned whether or not Kimani was a "good kid" or a "bad kid". Bad kids don't deserve to die unjustly by cops, either. The details surrounding his death as released by the NYPD are shady, vague, and full of holes, imo. I have a hard time believing that he would be stupid enough to aim a pistol at a cop car. Rekyia Boyd was killed by cops who claimed that they believed the cell phone a friend of hers was carrying was a gun. Cops aren't above making up wild accusations to try to cover their tracks when they let profiling and racialized thinking cause them to see things that aren't really there, wrongly taking a life in the process.
A List Of Children Killed By Drone Strikes In Pakistan and Yemen
A recent Marine Times article ran the alarming headline “Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders” on December 3, reporting on the death of three children in Afghanistan. They were apparently targeted by a U.S. military drone because they appeared to be digging a hole in a road.
Army Lt. Col. Marion Carrington, quoted in the article, said that “It kind of opens our aperture” that children are being used in the conflict. “In addition to looking for military-age males, it’s looking for children with potential hostile intent.”
Proponents of the drone war, including President Barack Obama, claim that drone strikes are precise and only target terrorists. A study, however, from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes “significantly and consistently underestimated" and that as many as 98% of those killed by drone strikes are civilians.
While it is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, this means that for every "terrorist" killed by a drone strike, anywhere between 10 and 50 civilians are killed.
Obama has authorized 193 drone strikes in Pakistan – four times the amount authorized by George W. Bush. According to Global Research, over the past 4 years Obama has authorized attacks in Pakistan which have killed more than 800 innocent civilians and just 22 Al-Qaeda officers.
---Obama is more bloodthirsty a warlord than any gang banger or Mafia hitman. He's not soft by any means.
Bush's body count is much higher, but he gets chewed out for being too aggressive. You tell me the hypocrisy with the American people between the two presidents.