Lou Cypher wrote: »I thought i saw it too. Its in the 2nd half of the trailer, It shows Krod (or that black suited Kryptonian) then someone on the ground in a bulky ass suit getting missiles shot at him or something. Ill find it.
I believe that's zod or a kryptonian you can see a cape real quick at the end
nawledge_god wrote: »Still Cool Beans wrote: »SMH at the revisionist history in here. Could not the same qualms have been made about one Christopher Nolan before Bats. I seem to recall him having a short but solid resume under his belt before being handed the reigns. Going by the logic in here though he never would've been considered. I don't recall Whedon being an accomplished blockbuster movie director either. Say what you want about his acting, as a writer and director, the dude has talent. You niggaz biases are clouding your perception. Either way doesn't look like he's gonna do it anyway. I do think that what this might indicate (based on the style of director Afleck has shown to be) is that WB intends to stick with the more grounded (as grounded as one can be when your dealing with fantastical elements that is) approach that has been set in the TDK trilogy and the coming Man of Steel.
The Difference Between Nolan And Affleck Are That Nolan Has 3 Critically Acclaimed Classics With The Following/Memento/And The Excellent Remake Of Insomnia...Affleck Has Too Aight Overrated Unoriginal Crime Dramas And Too Be Honest The Nolanverse Batman Trilogy Is A Little Overhyped/Overrated Anyway..Whedon Has Experience With Fantasy/Sci Fi Shit From His Shows And Even Wrote One Of The Best X Books Ever (Astonishing)...The Iron Man Movies Were Comedic In Tone So Favereau Was A Shoe In For That Franchise
This movie was shit...no real questions were answered...the human that decomposed himself in the beginning WTF?? And I don't see how Aliens are tied in to the plot other than to hype fans of the series....I wish I had two extra hands...Smh



