look men are not going to change we are going to objectify you and there is nothing you can do about it if you wear a tight skirt i'm going to try and get some of that pussy.
i'm not going to just grab you because that would be counter productive to my goal all this feminism shit that tries to ignore human nature needs to stop.
people change all the time
we used to marry 15 year olds
now we don't
your argument does not reflect reality
We don't marry 15 year olds now because people are living longer there was a change in human life the deleted the rush to marry and reproduce so quick. can you Stop being a fucking pussy for one second, men want to fuck women women want to be fucked or at lest they want the attention. we are just giving them what the fuck they want.
what can you do to stop a man from trying ?? nothing .
put a bullet in his head, lock him in a cell for 25 years, run him over with my car, gas him with zyklon b.. many things can stop him
calling me a pussy does not change the fact that human mating practices evolve
not only the ways we court women but the views of what is acceptable and unacceptable
from the surge in divorce to the concept of going dutch and open relationships
None of that shit has changed a fucking thing men still think the same the only real difference has been in our bouncing levels of freedom in expressing our urges. Men like you and others on this site have allowed women to unman males in this society. I don't advocate men touching women but other than that we should be able to say and do whatever the fuck we want. Women don't want the attention then it's on them to do something about it
I called you a pussy but what i really meant was your whole way of thinking is pussy It was not just a personal attack. this whole modern man 25% faggot way of seeing things is just fucking real pussy and unmanly. Divorce in most cases is unacceptable to me and so is going dutch and there is no such thing as an open relationship to me, if i'm fucking other girls it means i don't have a girlfriend and therefore am in no form or relationship except a sexual one.
So they'll prevent access into one door or the other with key fob programming?
Or will they take measures to INFLUENCE entry into one door or the other but not REQUIRE it?
The FHA prohibits discrimination on the basis of any of these 7 classes:
4. National Origin
7. Familial Status
States and Cities extend further protections based on other factors if they choose to do so.
I think NYC offers protection from discrimination based on "source of income." As long as you have a "lawful source of income" (which includes any form of federal, state, or local public assistance or housing assistance including section 8 vouchers) the property owners or their agents can't discriminate against you based on how your housing is paid for.
Now there are buildings/complexes that are structured to have certain residents use one entrance while others use another...out of convenience. If it's structured so the high end units have a certain view on one or two sides of the building and they're all bunched together, then there really is no problem with this. The perception is bad when you frame it as "Rich Door, Poor Door."
Developers, landlords, etc receive tax credits and other substantial benefits for offering lower income housing though so no this isn't really capitalism at work
Not to mention one of the goals of the inclusionary housing programs is the full integration of various socio-economic populations
This is just about not doing anything to offend the sensibilities of rich white people
You can't be serious. If it were that simple, these developers would have been doing it all along. Again, we're talking about housing in Manhattan that usually costs millions of dollars for one unit being given away for 60% of the median income in the area. No amount of tax credits and benefits will make up for that. The only reason these developers are doing this is because the government is now offering the incentive of relaxing on the building restrictions.
And yes, the developers are absolutely doing this to keep the rich people in their developments happy, and they should. Because anybody would get annoyed if they are paying 5 million dollars to live in a premium building and others are basically getting the same perk for $150,000. Again, if you paid $100 to get into VIP at a club, and after you did that, they started letting a bunch of people in there for $5, you'd be pissed too. If the developers didn't do something to offset that change, then the rich people would just leave and go somewhere else. That is capitalism. Ya'll don't have to like it. That's fine. But what country have ya'll been living one when you think that this is any different than 90% of the financial transactions that happen in this country on a daily basis?
this shit no different than paying to go thru the V.I.P. door at the club
if you dont like the rules dont choose to live there, people complain to much
People are trying to compare this to segregation, but I think that's just a result of the jaded way the article is being written.
Like someone said, this is really more similar to Club VIP sections than segregation. Basically, you have some super expensive housing facilities that are being required to dedicate space to lower income residents. So in an attempt to continue to justify the extreme prices they are charging the wealthier residents, they are giving perks to them. Yes, the door is one of them. It's not just that though. The wealthier residents get access to the special amenities and the poorer ones don't. Also, the more expensive homes are on the side of the building with the better view.
If you've got a problem with this then you basically have a problem with capitalism because this same thing happens in almost every aspect of American society. If you have more money to spend, shit will be better for you. Period.