Bruce_Wayne wrote: »

You can say a dude is good looking. It doesn't mean you gay. Only gay dudes say the shit you just said.

SMH.....this whole time I never knew you were a sodomite

no wonder you kept Robin around all the time

I always thought that relationship between ya'll didn't quite seem hetero

props to Mike Miller even tho he is built out of play-doh

wtf @ Ray Allen tho.........that mofo has been a non-factor for a couple games now

that nigga should be ashamed of himself..........maybe the Celtics knew something the rest of us didn't know

Lil Loca wrote: »

blakfyahking wrote: »

Lil Loca wrote: »

KingJamal wrote: »

While he has a point, Black capitalism isn't necessarily Black liberation imo.

really..............so what do you propose is better?


don't you help your mom run a business?

I like socialism, @blakfyahking .

Having a bunch of Black businesses doesn't mean anything--if everyone was Black in the US and corporations were run by a handful of Black business people, Black workers would still be exploited for their wages under capitalism. It's cool to have people of color being entrepreneurs, but that really doesn't change the dynamics of the market system.

and you believe this would happen because?

socialism has already been proven to be a failed premise----see the current Euro zone for example



you gotta stop subscribing to that liberal booty juice they serving you at that community college

The Lonious Monk wrote: »

blakfyahking wrote: »

The Lonious Monk wrote: »

I didn't glance over it. You said men don't have a safety net. Choosing not to do something and not being able to do something are two different things. Most men don't want to be house husbands which is why most alimony is not paid to men, but if a man chooses to go that route he'd have that option. And once again alimony is not about paying for the time, it's about compensating for what the relationship cost you in the long run. What you dudes don't seem to understand is that taking yourself off the job market for an extended amount of time can do irreparable damage to you ability to make money. It's one thing if you work at Walmart, then it doesn't matter, but if you're a professional long periods of time away can be a killer.

if you are a professional

you can do consultant work or open your own practice

which should be your goal anyways............no amount of time away from the job stops you from making money

unless you are forced to be a stay at home spouse, there's really no excuse for a grown ass adult to get paid for nothing because a court mandates it

alimony was created at a time when wives were essentially property

now it's just govt sanctioned extortion

lol how the fuck you going to be a consultant or open your own practice if you haven't even built your own brand? In most professions, you have to go out there and get the experience and the name before you can start to make moves like that. Your ass is not going to come straight out of business school, law school, medical school, etc... making the kinda money you can after you've been out in the market place putting in work.
No one said that the chick wouldn't be able to make money, but there is a difference between being able to make 60K because you're basically going to be entry level and making 200K because you got a decade of experience to go with your credentials.

bruh let's quit with the excuses

what really qualifies as experience? do you know how many people come straight out of school and do consulting in various fields?

hell, especially for those with medical degrees. you do know most doctors and dentists are private practices right? nothing is stopping an ex-wife from opening her own shop

she chose to forgo making 200K when she married her husband instead of choosing a career...........you saying she should be compensated for that when there was no guarantee she could've even made $200K?

that's like saying I should get paid by my ex-wife for getting a job to take care of my kid instead of going to the NBA..........LOL @ her having to pay me for potential earnings I can't even prove I could make

The Lonious Monk wrote: »

That's something completely different. I'm not talking about chicks that came into the marriage offering nothing and chose not to work because they really just wanted a meal ticket. Of course nothing should be mandated for chicks like this.

I'm talking about chicks who have a means to make money and would have done so if not for the wishes of their husbands. As I specifically said before, there are plenty of men out there making tons of money that don't even want their wives to work. My brother in law is like that now. His wife is a successful graphics designer. He's about to make a few mil selling this tech start up that he's working on. He wants her to give up her job and stop working. That's his wish not hers. Now if she does so to make him happy and they get divorced 10 years from now, why shouldn't he be expected to contribute something to helping her out until she can get back on her feet and start to reclaim some of what she gave up to appease him?

she shouldn't be compensated.............did she not make that decision out of love?

or are you saying love has a price? haha

MzGrahamBitches wrote: »

*I.B. Blackman* wrote: »

so young.

Kat is such a pedo

at least let them grow some hair on their lil bird chests 1st


SMH @ planning a gangbang 10 yrs from now