What's up everyone. We are doing a contest with T.I. and we are giving away $1200 a day for the next 10 days. Just wanted to give you all a heads up.
https://www.allhiphop.com/ti
https://www.allhiphop.com/ti
So, uhh.. was 9/11 an inside job or nah?
Comments
-
Why we never saw bin laden body? They gave him a respectable burial according to his religion supposedly but we talkin about a man who supposed to be responsible for all this 🤬 .
Exactly. They showed Saddam get hanged on tv. They showed Ghadaffi getting killed.....but the #1 enemy of the state, the #1 most wanted mf in the world was given a respectable burial at sea? And aint NO pictures or videos of it??? 🤬 , i don't buy it..
that entire story was on the level of a hollywood blockbuster, probably the biggest ever. this is the first time that the media and communication technology has been on this level throughout history and every medium of it was used to promote and propagate this. Bin Laden just like 🤬 was a creation, (not saying the men did not exist)
but their image was created, I dont doubt that they themselves played a hand in the fabrications either, but this happen to maintain and enforce more control, control over your mind by you believing this 🤬 , control over your "freedoms" by the laws enforced to prevent "terrorists" and control over a portion of the world per natural resources as well. checkmate. -
Yup, our gov'ment did itvvv Logical Ether vvv
The buildings fell at speed of free-fall meaning that each floor fell completely unobstructed by anything below it... We can talk about jet fuel all day but all three buildings fell at free-fall which can only mean that the subsequent level below was already falling before the floor above it could fall onto it i.e. it had been cleared. In the case of sandwiching (the phenomenon that supposedly justifies the collapses), the failing floor must hit the one beneath it, dislodge it, then hit the next, dislodge it (and so on): a process which slows the rate of falling. Buildings in controlled demolitions fall in the same manner as those that did during 9/11, NOT buildings that suffer from structural failure. The buildings should have also leaned if the collapses were due to heat, as the buildings' metal structures would distort with the heat. This would undoubtedly prohibit absolutely vertical collapses of the buildings as this would have made the buildings top-heavy, pulling to whichever side the greater damage would have existed (I'd assume the location of impact). Physics and mathematics don't lie. Humans do. The buildings were demolished. This is without even mentioning the fact that thermite jet fuel simply cannot cut base supports in a straight line, nor questioning the hilariously incredible finding of intact and full-proof evidence within moments of the disaster. There are many, many experts in their chosen fields who see the event as an inside job, highly distinguished physicists, engineers, avionics, professors, high ranking military personal, plus many more. Are they also ‘🤬 ’? (Not to mention the opinion of the supposed perpetrator himself, Osama Bin Laden, who surely should have claimed immediate responsibility after he had pulled off the most spectacular and successful terrorist attack in human history?) 2+2 does not equal 5; at least not for me. It's a disgusting shame that so many innocent people died as a result of this event, but it is more insulting to them, in my opinion, to believe the lies that we are fed and keep their deaths in vain.
Word, that's what confuses me. If a steel building is collapsing from heat it would start to lean and wobble back and forth first. Steel beams don't automatically just snap and break from heat. WTC 7 fell within 7 seconds. The only logical educated guess is controlled demolition.
Right. For the building to collapse like it did, then the support beams at the bottom would all have to blow. -
Why we never saw bin laden body? They gave him a respectable burial according to his religion supposedly but we talkin about a man who supposed to be responsible for all this 🤬 .
Exactly. They showed Saddam get hanged on tv. They showed Ghadaffi getting killed.....but the #1 enemy of the state, the #1 most wanted mf in the world was given a respectable burial at sea? And aint NO pictures or videos of it??? 🤬 , i don't buy it..
When you say they, you fail to mention that both men were killed by their own people. There is also the fact that Pakistan was highly upset over the incursion to get him, and they jailed the doctor that aided in his capture.
http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/osama-bin-laden-doctor-languishes-in-pakistan-prison-as-appeal-lingers-1216171 -
Nope, it was bin laden/taliban/terroristsVery weird how all 3 buildings fell.
But then i balance that with, how in the ENTIRE 🤬 would they pull of a controlled demolition?
Also, follow me on this. For the most part, we've never seen a plane purposely fly into a skyscraper, yet you're comfortable saying what that SHOULD look like. Ok
On the flip, most of us HAVE seen controlled demolitions on tv or YouTube whatever. It comes with specific sounds, the flashes of the igntion, etc. It does not happen quietly.
Soooooo if the towers falling does not look like it "should" and that makes you skeptical. ...Shouldn't the towers going down in a QUIET low key controlled demolition on live tv cause more suspicion? Isnt that JUST as and actually MORE far fetched? ??
@vibe Am i goin crazy or does that not make perfect sense? Like is it me? Lls -
Very weird how all 3 buildings fell.
But then i balance that with, how in the ENTIRE 🤬 would they pull of a controlled demolition?
Also, follow me on this. For the most part, we've never seen a plane purposely fly into a skyscraper, yet you're comfortable saying what that SHOULD look like. Ok
On the flip, most of us HAVE seen controlled demolitions on tv or YouTube whatever. It comes with specific sounds, the flashes of the igntion, etc. It does not happen quietly.
Soooooo if the towers falling does not look like it "should" and that makes you skeptical. ...Shouldn't the towers going down in a QUIET low key controlled demolition on live tv cause more suspicion? Isnt that JUST as and actually MORE far fetched? ??
@vibe Am i goin crazy or does that not make perfect sense? Like is it me? Lls
Family controlled demo or not that building didn't fall quietly.
I am no expert here but every floor didn't need to be wired for explosives for it collapse the way it did. Considering the building was over 100 stories perhaps it's difficult to hear detonations past a certain height.
-
Yup, our gov'ment did itVery weird how all 3 buildings fell.
But then i balance that with, how in the ENTIRE 🤬 would they pull of a controlled demolition?
Also, follow me on this. For the most part, we've never seen a plane purposely fly into a skyscraper, yet you're comfortable saying what that SHOULD look like. Ok
On the flip, most of us HAVE seen controlled demolitions on tv or YouTube whatever. It comes with specific sounds, the flashes of the igntion, etc. It does not happen quietly.
Soooooo if the towers falling does not look like it "should" and that makes you skeptical. ...Shouldn't the towers going down in a QUIET low key controlled demolition on live tv cause more suspicion? Isnt that JUST as and actually MORE far fetched? ??
@vibe Am i goin crazy or does that not make perfect sense? Like is it me? Lls
The towers would be closed off weeks before 9/11 to treat for asbestos.
So you saying a controlled demolition is more far fetched than amateur pilots flying big ass commercial planes into giant buildings and hitting both of them perfectly? -
Yup, our gov'ment did itThe thing is witnesses heard explosives.
-
Nope, it was bin laden/taliban/terroristsThe thing is witnesses heard explosives.
*Explosions. There's a difference.
And I have no problem with that part causing doubt. There's PLENTY of doubt
But when it comes to the dealbreakers and irrefutable 🤬 , its not there.
Doesnt add up. Too biased
For example, let yall tell it i shouldn't believe these planes could do that amount of damage, but i SHOULD believe an amount of explosive to blow the building was also small enough to be covertly transported INTO he building in midtown Manhattan AND easily concealed once in the building lol
Im not asking for folk to eliminate doubt, all im asking for is consistency. Call it both ways! If what I or the govt is saying is SO BIZARRE, dont in the same breath act like the misjointed, unconneced, "It took 20 people to pull this off" 🤬 yall sayin ain't
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate it@Vibe have you ever seen the video of cnn report on the Pentagon that day
Reporter said the floors were still intact and didn't collapse until 45 mins later
Yes.
Why?
It was on fire for 7 hours.
Firemen said it was going to collapse and moved everyone back. It collapsed 2 hours later. They could hear the structure weakening; groaning, moaning, creaking, breaking glass etc
Word got around it was going to collapse. BBC jumped the gun.
But nah, BBC is in on it, as well as the firemen.
bro so do you believe the plane never went through the walls and disintegrated on contact
Through the towers, yes. Not desinagrate on contact, though. The plane some what remained in the buildings, which is the "molten" stuff you see dripping from the towers. -
@S2J Downtown Manhattan. Wall Street District.. Still very busy.
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itYall gotta get in key with how the towers were built, especially the top of both towers. No other building at the time was built like the towers. (not sure about now)
Again, watch 9/11: The Towers and The Pentagon. -
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itThe thing is witnesses heard explosives.
*Explosions. There's a difference.
And I have no problem with that part causing doubt. There's PLENTY of doubt
But when it comes to the dealbreakers and irrefutable 🤬 , its not there.
Doesnt add up. Too biased
For example, let yall tell it i shouldn't believe these planes could do that amount of damage, but i SHOULD believe an amount of explosive to blow the building was also small enough to be covertly transported INTO he building in midtown Manhattan AND easily concealed once in the building lol
Im not asking for folk to eliminate doubt, all im asking for is consistency. Call it both ways! If what I or the govt is saying is SO BIZARRE, dont in the same breath act like the misjointed, unconneced, "It took 20 people to pull this off" 🤬 yall sayin ain't
Witnesses are describing a hectic day. Everything was suspect. They use a lot of "it was like" to explain things, but conspiracy theorists are infamous for purposely misquoting all witness testimony.
It's similar to when a car crashes through a house..
"It was like a freight train"
We don't go around yelling "conspiracy! A freight train did it! Thanks a lot, Obama!"
Silly truthers. -
Vibe "There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE or WITNESSES to back up any 9/11 conspiracy"The thing is witnesses heard explosives.
*Explosions. There's a difference.
And I have no problem with that part causing doubt. There's PLENTY of doubt
But when it comes to the dealbreakers and irrefutable 🤬 , its not there.
Doesnt add up. Too biased
For example, let yall tell it i shouldn't believe these planes could do that amount of damage, but i SHOULD believe an amount of explosive to blow the building was also small enough to be covertly transported INTO he building in midtown Manhattan AND easily concealed once in the building lol
Im not asking for folk to eliminate doubt, all im asking for is consistency. Call it both ways! If what I or the govt is saying is SO BIZARRE, dont in the same breath act like the misjointed, unconneced, "It took 20 people to pull this off" 🤬 yall sayin ain't
Witnesses are describing a hectic day. Everything was suspect. They use a lot of "it was like" to explain things, but conspiracy theorists are infamous for purposely misquoting all witness testimony.
It's similar to when a car crashes through a house..
"It was like a freight train"
We don't go around yelling "conspiracy! A freight train did it! Thanks a lot, Obama!"
Silly truthers.
" Um you know witnesses said they heard bombs exploding before the collapse"
Vibe "Nope. Don't believe them witnesses son. It was a hectic day"
This 🤬 be talking in circles lol
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itPost a bomb.
Post a missile.
I'm still waiting. -
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itGimme a witness quote, though, with their name.
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate it"witnesses heard bombs before the collapse"
*was filmed from all angles; ground, buildings, across town, the sky. No explosions were ever heard or recorded*
logic -
Sure, let me know if this enough my son:Gimme a witness quote, though, with their name.
Rich Banaciski -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Ladder 22]
... and then I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.
Brian Becker -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Engine 28]
The collapse hadn't begun, but it was not a fire any more up there. It was like -- it was like that -- like smoke explosion on a tremendous scale going on up there.
Greg Brady -- E.M.T. (E.M.S.) [Battalion 6]
We were standing underneath and Captain Stone was speaking again. We heard -- I heard 3 loud explosions. I look up and the north tower is coming down now, 1 World Trade Center.
Timothy Burke -- Firefigter (F.D.N.Y.) [Engine 202]
But it seemed like I was going oh, my 🤬 , there is a secondary device because the way the building popped. I thought it was an explosion.
Ed Cachia -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Engine 53]
we originally had thought there was like an internal detonation explosives because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down.
Frank Campagna -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Ladder 11]
You see three explosions and then the whole thing coming down.
Craig Carlsen -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Ladder 8]
... you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions.
Jason Charles -- E.M.T. (E.M.S.)
... and then I heard an explosion from up, from up above, and I froze and I was like, oh, s___, I'm dead because I thought the debris was going to hit me in the head and that was it.
...
I look over my shoulder and I says, oh, s___, and then I turned around and looked up and that's when I saw the tower coming down.
Frank Cruthers -- Chief (F.D.N.Y.) [Citywide Tour Commander]
.. there was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse.
Kevin Darnowski -- Paramedic (E.M.S.)
I heard three explosions, and then we heard like groaning and grinding, and tower two started to come down.
Dominick Derubbio -- Battalion Chief (F.D.N.Y.) [Division 8]
It was weird how it started to come down. It looked like it was a timed explosion ...
Karin Deshore -- Captain (E.M.S.)
Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode.
Brian Dixon -- Battalion Chief (F.D.N.Y.)
... the lowest floor of fire in the south tower actually looked like someone had planted explosives around it because the whole bottom I could see -- I could see two sides of it and the other side -- it just looked like that floor blew out. I looked up and you could actually see everything blew out on the one floor. I thought, geez, this looks like an explosion up there, it blew out.
Michael Donovan -- Captain (F.D.N.Y.)
I thought there had been an explosion or a bomb that they had blown up there.
Thomas Fitzpatrick -- Deputy Commissioner for Administration (F.D.N.Y.)
Some people thought it was an explosion. I don't think I remember that. I remember seeing it, it looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building.
... -
And Vibe said ain't no witnesses tho smh
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itMy copy is 🤬 me off so I screen shot it
Randomly chose one of the quotes to search,
What he said
Brian Dixon -- Battalion Chief (F.D.N.Y.)
... the lowest floor of fire in the south tower actually looked like someone had planted explosives around it because the whole bottom I could see -- I could see two sides of it and the other side -- it just looked like that floor blew out. I looked up and you could actually see everything blew out on the one floor. I thought, geez, this looks like an explosion up there, it blew out.
His full quote:
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itblackamerica wrote: »And Vibe said ain't no witnesses tho smh
No, never said that, I said their words are TWISTED, as I just proved.
I'll do another quote. -
Who cares this 🤬 old news. There are two choices to make America or terrorists. If you choose terrorists you will say 🤬 yeah America. If you choose to believe America you'll rant about how 🤬 the country is and go nowhere from there. Same damn arguments for 14 years.
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itCraig Carlsen -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Ladder 8]
... you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions.
^ his quote
in full
-
Yup, our gov'ment did itThis same government acted like they didnt know the Boston marathon bombers either
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itFitzpatrick last quote on your post..
in full
-
Maybe our gov knew about it but they didnt orchestrate itHe explains its windows, and says it was "like an implosion".. a way to describe the collapse, similar to "it was like a frieght train"..
