Yo i love the Ic
A) A violent uprising is NOT viable and it is NOT happening, so im not gonna entertain it =
Coon. Scared coon. Boooo! Hisss!
B ) A violent uprising is NOT viable and it is NOT happening... oh b-bb-bb-but if it did I'd hop off this keyboard and kill EVERYBODY!
'Yea that's right, and and, I'd kill every cracka in my sights!'
'Yeaa! We storming capitol and walkin home with our freedom, jack!'
So if violence isn't the answer then what is?
To be 100% honest with you, i don't really feel like having that conversation with biased minds. Shit is sad, can't lie . And thats not code for 'i got the ansews but i aint tellin' . My ideas aren't much different than the ones that actual logical people IRL speak on.
But you cant talk core solutions if you cant agree on core problems and core objectives. There's no point for those 2 groups to talk
Ie, If group A's objective is get-back, and group B's objective is justice , we can't talk solutions
If group A's target enemy is all white people and group B's is specifically the police, we can't talk solutions
If group A's goal is to eradicate white people and get a race war poppin, and group B's goal is specifically to get justice and prosecutions against killer cops and thus make them think long and hard before they pull that trigger, then we can't talk solutions .